slippery eel
Juniors
- Messages
- 456
After the Eels smacked the Saints. Id rather be St.George on 22 points than Parramatta on 18!. Well theyre both on 24 points, but the Eels have a better for and against. Good one Nathan.
:lol:

Southernsaint said:Yep, for season 2003 Saints really do "have the smell of Parramatta about them"...
Cheers,
Ben S.
Interesting thought - I'll look up the scores tonight. People still talk about the 91-6 scoreline from almost 70 years ago. I should imagine 74-4 will keep us entertained for some time as well. 8)slippery eel said:Was that the biggest lose by a team since 1935?.
slippery eel said:Was that the biggest lose by a team since 1935?.
Jimbo said:We have a very good explanation for our record loss.
What an overflow of stupidity.
When Saints were done 70-10, I wrote a damning piece which listed all our faults and how it was an insult to the supporters. I said that at the very least, the club and the players owed the fans an apology.
These thoughts were echoed by ex-players and other fans.
As it turned out, the players did aplogise and even Anthony Mundine, the bloke who is hated for havng a big head, came out and apologised.
That's the difference between our clubs. We demand better. When Cronulla stuff up, they look to pin the blame on someone else.
Where do we start?? Failure to respect the final decision of the referee?? Bringing the game into disrepute?? A send-off due to a player indiscriminently attacking the head of an opponent??
74-4, it must be John Lang's fault - surely the Cardiac King couldn't be responsible for that debacle, he of the much vaunted "winning culture"...