RIP NRL

[AlwaysGreen]

Let's move on

 

[GAZF]

Let's move on
View attachment 33807

Needs timestamps.

 

[Walt Flanigan]

Let's move on
View attachment 33807

 

[Valheru]

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ro...t-like-raiders-refs-boss-20191102-p536vg.html

Discuss

 

[TheDalek079]

Refs boss says Roosters should have gotten a penalty for soliola bashing into Keary's legs. So cockosh was right!!!!!!!!!

 

[Cockosh]

Refs boss says Roosters should have gotten a penalty for soliola bashing into Keary's legs. So cockosh was right!!!!!!!!!

It was pretty obvious to anyone that watches nrl. Not sure what was wrong with the 6 again when teddy knocked on the bomb though?

 

[t-ba]

Why is the winning coach so f**king salty?

lol.

 

[Canard]

Danny Weidler doing his bosses bidding.

 

[Vee]

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ro...t-like-raiders-refs-boss-20191102-p536vg.html

Discuss

And if Ricky went through the game wuth Robbo's forensic comb, I'm sure he would have found others in the Raiders favour that Robbo failed to mention. This thread is about the howlers.

 

[Spot On]

Refs boss says Roosters should have gotten a penalty for soliola bashing into Keary's legs. So cockosh was right!!!!!!!!!

What fool didn't think that was a penalty???

 

[Valheru]

And if Ricky went through the game wuth Robbo's forensic comb, I'm sure he would have found others in the Raiders favour that Robbo failed to mention. This thread is about the howlers.

Lol this thread is about any decision that went the roosters way whilst ignoring the ones that didn't.

The trainer decision wasn't a howler, it was the correct decision.

The 6 again was originally a howler against the roosters.

I'm all ears for any wrong decisions that actually went against the raiders.

 

[Cockosh]

Danny Weidler doing his bosses bidding.

So the refs didn’t say they got those decisions wrong? Did weidler make it up?

 

[Mr Spock!]

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ro...t-like-raiders-refs-boss-20191102-p536vg.html

Discuss

LOL the sin bin on Cronk was harsh... Ffs

Was a try under the posts....

 

[Valheru]

LOL the sin bin on Cronk was harsh... Ffs

Was a try under the posts....

How was it a try under the posts?

Why is the tackle suddenly ineffective if he tackles him half a second later as he catches the ball?

 

[BadnMean]

Lol this thread is about any decision that went the roosters way whilst ignoring the ones that didn't.

The trainer decision wasn't a howler, it was the correct decision.

The 6 again was originally a howler against the roosters.

I'm all ears for any wrong decisions that actually went against the raiders.

The 6 again wasn't correct though- every still I've seen of it shows it coming off Roosters shoulder- hence why it bounced so far & fast. Rooters fans have tried to mythologise it into being "wrong but corrected" after the fact and the refs jumped on as a way to cover their arse. But it's simply not clear. Suits the agenda though.

There's also the "Raiders had all the ball but couldn't score" crap. Raiders are the only team that scored a fair dinkum try in the game, without a lottery ball leg up ala Rooters suddenly getting another 6 in good position after the trainer incident & another following the "6 again, nah just kidding, handover now" incident.

You had the lucky breaks & won the GF- just accept it as much.

 

[Canard]

So the refs didn’t say they got those decisions wrong? Did weidler make it up?

Read the article bub, it's a gossip article designed to make the Roosters feel better.

No official is quoted.

It's a load of horseshit, paid for by Uncle Nick.

 

[TheDalek079]

The 6 again wasn't correct though- every still I've seen of it shows it coming off Roosters shoulder- hence why it bounced so far & fast. Rooters fans have tried to mythologise it into being "wrong but corrected" after the fact and the refs jumped on as a way to cover their arse. But it's simply not clear. Suits the agenda though.

There's also the "Raiders had all the ball but couldn't score" crap. Raiders are the only team that scored a fair dinkum try in the game, without a lottery ball leg up ala Rooters suddenly getting another 6 in good position after the trainer incident & another following the "6 again, nah just kidding, handover now" incident.

You had the lucky breaks & won the GF- just accept it as much.

Stop trolling. The raiders try wasn't fair dinkum - the refs boss said the six again call that lead to it was incorrect. And the trainer being hit I'd irrelevant - refs boss said it should have been a roosters penalty. So nothing wrong with Sammy V's try

 

[Valheru]

The 6 again wasn't correct though- every still I've seen of it shows it coming off Roosters shoulder- hence why it bounced so far & fast. Rooters fans have tried to mythologise it into being "wrong but corrected" after the fact and the refs jumped on as a way to cover their arse. But it's simply not clear. Suits the agenda though.

There's also the "Raiders had all the ball but couldn't score" crap. Raiders are the only team that scored a fair dinkum try in the game, without a lottery ball leg up ala Rooters suddenly getting another 6 in good position after the trainer incident & another following the "6 again, nah just kidding, handover now" incident.

You had the lucky breaks & won the GF- just accept it as much.

Lol it clear as day came off a raiders player.

Not might have, not 50/50, it 100% did.

The raiders did have their chance and just weren't good enough. You can force yourself to believe our tries weren't legit of you want but your defence was found to be wanting on both occassions.

Again, they just weren't good enough.

 

[typicalfan]

Lol it clear as day came off a raiders player.

Not might have, not 50/50, it 100% did.

The raiders did have their chance and just weren't good enough. You can force yourself to believe our tries weren't legit of you want but your defence was found to be wanting on both occassions.

Again, they just weren't good enough.

Not to Cummins though was it?

Sure it's obvious to those with replays and multiple slow mos but live these decisions are made and lived with for both sides.

It's like a commentator waiting for a replay to say how bad a decision was.

 

[Cockosh]

Read the article bub, it's a gossip article designed to make the Roosters feel better.

No official is quoted.

It's a load of horseshit, paid for by Uncle Nick.

Yep I read the article. I’m sure the nrl will issue a correction today if weidler took it upon himself to make it up. Until then you’ll just have to accept that the roosters won another title despite copping some awful calls against them. It must burn you. Hope you’re ok.
I’m still trying to figure out why uncle nick keeps paying the refs to not give us penalties???