hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,687
His record overall is bog average no matter how you slice it. But but but but 43% is good for a club like ours........Zero from f**ken three you mean?!?!?
His record overall is bog average no matter how you slice it. But but but but 43% is good for a club like ours........Zero from f**ken three you mean?!?!?
Kearney has won about 43% with the Warriors and Stuart has won 47% at Canberra, 42% at the Sharks and 62% at the Roosters.His record overall is bog average no matter how you slice it. But but but but 43% is good for a club like ours........
Who knows?? Would they struggle there is a good chance but they are both very ordinary coaches. Just like Arthur.Kearney has won about 43% with the Warriors and Stuart has won 47% at Canberra, 42% at the Sharks and 62% at the Roosters.
How do you reckon they would go at Parra?
Oh I think we know.Who knows??
Well Stuart did hand Arthur a stronger squad than what he and Kearney inherited.Oh I think we know.
No BA would love to infect them with his looser culture.We already have a very inexperienced side. I'm not sure a couple of blokes who could still be playing Flegg are what we need.
Salmon had 8 week in halves. I dont think he offered anything bar a body in defense.
He scored more tries than Smith did.
He set up more line drop outs than Smith did.
He defended better than Smith did.
I realise I'm on a hiding to nothing, because Smith is a former Panther, but Salmon played just as well, if not better, than Smith.
Smith has had 2 games and both where close losses. Also behind packs that didnt do a lot.
Salmon had hance to play in games where we pumped the opposition and he still did not create a whole lot in those wins. Of course he was not terrible but not a massive contributor.
I like Salmon and long term I see him as a better prospect but currently I prefer to let Smith have a few more games.
With Salmon at 5/8 we where beaten by Canberra easily, Belted by Knights and polaxed by the Storm.
We did beat Saints,Tigers and Sharks. Salmon was ok in those wins.
Salmon was hardly the reason we lost to the Storm, Knights and Canberra.With Salmon at 5/8 we where beaten by Canberra easily, Belted by Knights and polaxed by the Storm.
We did beat Saints,Tigers and Sharks. Salmon was ok in those wins.
And our attack has been absolutely dreadful, 3 tries in two games. One of an intercept and the other two off kicks. Bring back Luke Kelly FFS!!And with Smith at 6 we have been beaten by 2 bottom 4 teams.
But compared to Dill Smith he’s fine. The bloke is a walking brain fart. His strength is his running game which we didn’t see instead he tried to be a play maker. He got lucky with a kick when we score anyway if we go through the hands everything else he touched turned to shit as usual. At least Salmon wasn’t overplaying his hand constantly.People on here were whinging deluxe about what salmon offers as a 6.
Well we have no alternative without Drown, so i think people should face reality and stop bitching about each one. They are all we haveBut compared to Dill Smith he’s fine. The bloke is a walking brain fart. His strength is his running game which we didn’t see instead he tried to be a play maker. He got lucky with a kick when we score anyway if we go through the hands everything else he touched turned to shit as usual. At least Salmon wasn’t overplaying his hand constantly.