Babyface O'reilly
Coach
- Messages
- 11,711
At least someone is questioning this in the media.
Thanks Gus.
So what now?
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-as-manlys-hopes-go-south-20130924-2uc93.html
3. Penalties why the Roosters?
Much has been written about the number of penalties conceded by the Roosters this season and the trend of recent years that has seen the Roosters as one of the most penalised sides in the NRL. It is odd considering the constant changes in coaches and players that continually occur at NRL clubs, including the Roosters, that one club would regularly feature in this position each year. However, what is even stranger is that this same club, again through a myriad of coaches and playing rosters, is also among the clubs receiving the least amount of penalties. Since 2008, the Roosters have had a negative penalty differential of 240, a whopping 148 worse than their nearest rivals, Canterbury. Since 2000, through six coaches and the introduction of 251 new players into their first-grade ranks, the Roosters have only finished higher than eighth on the penalty differential table once in 14 seasons and have not finished higher than 14th since 2007. It's very rare to see such a statistical anomaly continue over such a long period of time, given the large turnover of personnel during this period.
Thanks Gus.
So what now?
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-as-manlys-hopes-go-south-20130924-2uc93.html
3. Penalties why the Roosters?
Much has been written about the number of penalties conceded by the Roosters this season and the trend of recent years that has seen the Roosters as one of the most penalised sides in the NRL. It is odd considering the constant changes in coaches and players that continually occur at NRL clubs, including the Roosters, that one club would regularly feature in this position each year. However, what is even stranger is that this same club, again through a myriad of coaches and playing rosters, is also among the clubs receiving the least amount of penalties. Since 2008, the Roosters have had a negative penalty differential of 240, a whopping 148 worse than their nearest rivals, Canterbury. Since 2000, through six coaches and the introduction of 251 new players into their first-grade ranks, the Roosters have only finished higher than eighth on the penalty differential table once in 14 seasons and have not finished higher than 14th since 2007. It's very rare to see such a statistical anomaly continue over such a long period of time, given the large turnover of personnel during this period.