You’d have to think so but I’d say the team list will be the same.Kenny has to be an inclusion IMO.
Better side easily IMO.You’d have to think so but I’d say the team list will be the same.
Come game day Matagi drops off, Moeroa plays in the middle, Taka starts on the edge and Edwards comes onto the bench.
Kenny has to be an inclusion IMO.
Hopefully down the s-bend and not on the floor.I lose my shit every day ... who knows where it ends up
If Brown isn't going to play 80 minutes (and he didn't on the weekend), why not bring him off the bench?No doubt BA will pick Scott, but for mine he starts (which he can’t take Browns spot) or he plays Wenty until we get injuries.
Agreed. Plus King is a defensive liability over 80 minutes. He was tackling at 88% in the first half but only 82% in the second half.I’d like to see Kaysa or Smith at 14 and have a 20min stint getting at some tired forwards from dummy half
If Brown isn't going to play 80 minutes (and he didn't on the weekend), why not bring him off the bench?
Agreed. Plus King is a defensive liability over 80 minutes. He was tackling at 88% in the first half but only 82% in the second half.
However, giving him 80 minutes may allow a smaller utility on the bench to give King a rest.Does he though? We have four blokes on the bench keen for a run - they are interchange forwards, not reserves. Surely a player can give more effective minutes if he doesn't have to play so many of them.
The only upside of an 80 minute forward is that you don't have to waste any precious interchanges on him. But suppose he plays 60, he can do it all in one stint and only use one interchange (either coming on at the 20th minute or leaving the field in the 60th).