What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rule changes!

Messages
15,203
According to rleague.com

The NRL have announced, that teams who “waste time” in kicking for goal will be fined. The NRL have brought in a shot clock where a team’s kicker will have 1 minute and 30 seconds to kick for goal.

The shot clock starts from the moment a try is scored, or when the referee blows his whistle for a penalty. Fines start from $2000 with clubs issued with a breach notice if the NRL believe kickers have wasted time.

The shot clock was first talked about after the Warriors beat the Roosters last year. The Roosters didn’t take the loss well and chose instead to focus on the length of time it took Brent Webb to kick for goal. Oddly enough, stats later revealed the Roosters took longer to kick at goal than Brent Webb when they hit the front with only a few minutes to go.

The hardest part for the NRL will be to actually prove that teams are deliberately wasting time.

Other rule changes announced focused on extra time and being help up in goal. They changes announced are as follows.

1. Coin Toss (pre game & to commence extra time)

The team winning the toss now has the option of choosing which end of the field to defend, or alternatively may elect to kick-off to commence play. If the team winning the toss elects to kick-off, the choice of ends reverts to the team losing the toss.

Currently a team whose player is held up in goal while in possession before the fifth tackle will receive a scrum feed 10m from the goal line and an effective restarting of the tackle count. The rule will be altered along the following lines:

2. Held-up In-Goal

When an attacking player is held-up in his opponents in-goal area and is unable to ground the ball, play will be restarted by the player in possession playing the ball 10 metres out from the goal line directly opposite the point where he was held-up. The tackle count will then continue in the normal manner (ie. if a player is held-up on tackle 3, play will resume with a play-the-ball 10 metres from the goal line and the following tackle will be tackle 4). Please note that if a player in possession is held-up on the sixth tackle, there is no change to the existing rule (i.e. a 'hand-over' 10m out).

These rule changes will apply throughout the upcoming regional trials, however no breaches will be issued in relation to goal kicking until the commencement of the Telstra Premiership on Friday March 12.
 

gunnamatta bay

Referee
Messages
21,084
2. Held-up In-Goal

When an attacking player is held-up in his opponents in-goal area and is unable to ground the ball, play will be restarted by the player in possession playing the ball 10 metres out from the goal line directly opposite the point where he was held-up. The tackle count will then continue in the normal manner (ie. if a player is held-up on tackle 3, play will resume with a play-the-ball 10 metres from the goal line and the following tackle will be tackle 4). Please note that if a player in possession is held-up on the sixth tackle, there is no change to the existing rule (i.e. a 'hand-over' 10m out).

Very sensible. It used to bug me to see good defence prevent the grounding of the ball only to see the attacking side be rewarded with a scrum feed and almost always followed by a try.

I bet the coaches are already scheming their new tactics.
 

wittyfan

Immortal
Messages
30,006
:clap: About time they took some action over these timewasters with their goal kicks. Though I'm not sure why they felt the need to change the rules regarding coin tosses, unless there's a gale force breeze there's little advantage in it anyway.
 
Messages
4,792
Gunna Matter said:
2. Held-up In-Goal

When an attacking player is held-up in his opponents in-goal area and is unable to ground the ball, play will be restarted by the player in possession playing the ball 10 metres out from the goal line directly opposite the point where he was held-up. The tackle count will then continue in the normal manner (ie. if a player is held-up on tackle 3, play will resume with a play-the-ball 10 metres from the goal line and the following tackle will be tackle 4). Please note that if a player in possession is held-up on the sixth tackle, there is no change to the existing rule (i.e. a 'hand-over' 10m out).

Very sensible. It used to bug me to see good defence prevent the grounding of the ball only to see the attacking side be rewarded with a scrum feed and almost always followed by a try.

I bet the coaches are already scheming their new tactics.

Yeah, I like the held up in goal rule too, it rewards good defence.
 

Booyah

Bench
Messages
4,666
2. Held-up In-Goal

When an attacking player is held-up in his opponents in-goal area and is unable to ground the ball, play will be restarted by the player in possession playing the ball 10 metres out from the goal line directly opposite the point where he was held-up. The tackle count will then continue in the normal manner (ie. if a player is held-up on tackle 3, play will resume with a play-the-ball 10 metres from the goal line and the following tackle will be tackle 4). Please note that if a player in possession is held-up on the sixth tackle, there is no change to the existing rule (i.e. a 'hand-over' 10m out).

I Like it. It'll make things more interesting for both the attackers and the defenders. We'll see alot of great desperate defense like Big Hits and stuff. You Beauty! :D

We'll also see some good attacking options because the attacking team wont have the same opportunities. Kick and chases, Chip and chase et all.

I can't remember how many times it would frustrate me last year when defending teams were continually being bombarded by an attacking team and holding up player after player after player in the in-goal, only to see a scrum pack and it happen all over again. Very bloody boring for both the players and the fans.
 
Messages
3,296
What we will see though is players being dragged across the goal line. It will then just be a matter of time until this fraught with danger tactic backfires (and I just hope that it doesn't happen to our boys). I predict that the first try to be conceded from this will occur in Round 2.

A good rule change this one and about time.
 

DJDL

First Grade
Messages
5,496
Why does the NRL feel the need to make rule changes every year?
You don't see it in other sports.

I liked the rule as it was. How is a team supposed to maintain pressure? Defensive teams now know they just have to hold on for one set and then look for either the grubber or the bomb. Boring.
 

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
I'd love to see a season where there isn't a significant rule change. Just wait and see... the media will latch onto some rule this season which nobody has ever had a problem with in the past, and we'll see more new rules introduced for 2005.

Argh!
 

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,079
laws always change in all facets of life .
I think these changes are good.
I was thinking that teams were ready to exploit the held up rule this year & I'm glad the league stepped in before it happened.
I could not care less about the kick for goal rule.
Only person that affects is channel 9 because they have to do more editing for their "NON LIVE!!!!" coverage.
 

wittyfan

Immortal
Messages
30,006
I want to see the Golden Point rule abolished!!!! 80 minutes is enough time for a result in regular games. :x
 

Latest posts

Top