Just a question, (not a criticism) MX you're suggesting that Penrith would have been better in holding unto these players and use them as bargining tools for trades. Would that have made us over the cap ? Wouldn't it also be an issue if opposition clubs had already spent their money, and Penrith be left 'holding the baby'.
I'll admit to knowing little about this type of thing.
Well Jimmy was always leaving. Thats ~$850k right thete. So you let RCG go since hes our highest paid dud. Use his money for Korisau and get us back under cap with along with Jimmy money.
Then use the rest as bargaining chips. Tigers were desperate for DWZ and would have been quiet the bargaining chip to have. Likewise Blake would have been a big name to offer up aswell.
At the very least I believe we could have gotten more of their salary off our cap. If Eels had the money free to sign Matterson they could easily have paid more for Blake.
We could have aimed at trading DWZ for Matterson, then Blake to Eels with us covering less since they didnt land Matterson.
Might not work out that way. But if we couldnt get anyone atleast we had them. As it stands now we gave away a bunch of players and covered alot of their salaries. We should have had all the power if the players wanted out and other clubs wanted them. Yet in the end the players and opposition clubs got the better end of the deal.
I dont see us being in a good position to make signings at all right now. Other clubs have an advantage over us in the market so at best we get the scraps. In which case we are better off not signing anyone. I think we are in a very desperate position right now when the situation could have been worked in our favor. Or atleast less so against us.