What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumoured/Confirmed Signings and General Drivel XV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
84,867
Yes, and recognising the selection bias is what got Jimmy the Greek in a lot of trouble in the US.

I got permanently banned from another site for pointing out that Europeans and Americans of West African descent were over-represented as Olympic medal winners, especially compared to West Africans of West African descent.

This site was mostly Americans, by the way. Some things you just can't talk about.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...t-of-pocket-at-parramatta-20140329-zqobj.html

Jarryd Hayne could fly after being left out of pocket at Parramatta

Date
March 29, 2014 - 10:20PM

Adrian Proszenko
Chief Rugby League Reporter

There are fears Jarryd Hayne could walk out on Parramatta due to a series of third-party payments not being honoured, leaving him out of pocket to the tune of up to $200,000.

Hayne is understandably upset at the situation and his manager, Wayne Beavis, met with the club for crisis talks during the week.

"I don't discuss players' contract details," said Eels CEO Scott Seward. "We work through every issue in regards to every player we have to ensure we honour all of our commitments. Jarryd is one of our players and we'll honour everything we said we'd do."

The situation has been likened to that of Mark Gasnier, who walked out on the Dragons in 2008 when some of his contract payments weren't fulfilled. Under NRL rules, clubs are not allowed to guarantee TPA payments.

Rival clubs, most notably Canterbury, are aware of the dramas and are closely monitoring the situation. The Bulldogs are desperate to sign a gun fullback to replace Ben Barba and it's understood they would take Hayne in a heartbeat if he were to become available.

The 'Family Club' has no trouble attracting third-party arrangements for star players, as evidenced by the package they put together for Andrew Fifita.

They would also be able to table a long-term deal. Ditto the Roosters, who will have money to spend once Sonny Bill Williams moves on at the end of the season.

The Eels can ill afford to lose or upset Hayne, their co-captain and most influential player. They have earned the wooden spoon in the past two seasons with him in the team - the prospect of the blue and golds without him would be a scary one for the club and its supporters.
 

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
19,605
Third party payments have nothing to do with the club - they should have chosen their sponsors better
 

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
19,605
. The 'Family Club' has no trouble attracting third-party arrangements for star players, as evidenced by the package they put together for Andrew Fifita.

Isn't this a breach of the salary cap ? Are they not meant to be independent ? With no connection to the club
 

born an eel

Bench
Messages
3,882
as these are supposed to be at arms length from the club maybe it's his manager who he should be changing
 

Forty20

First Grade
Messages
7,677
Given some of the ridiculous contracts that have been thrown around of late, Hayne would command a stupidly large amount of money in the current market. There would only be a handful of clubs that could afford a marquee player like him if he were to suddenly become available.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
32,214
What a load of horse shit. Hayne isn't going anywhere. He will never leave unless we don't want him anymore.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
84,867
We would cope without him. Think of the money he would free up if he left. He is our best player but he's on a lot of money. How much value would he be providing?

It's all about value. It would actually be worse to lose Radradra because he's on peanuts at the moment. That's where we're getting the best value.
 

Joshuatheeel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
19,605
We would cope without him. Think of the money he would free up if he left. He is our best player but he's on a lot of money. How much value would he be providing?

It's all about value. It would actually be worse to lose Radradra because he's on peanuts at the moment. That's where we're getting the best value.

I actually reckon peats is now our most valued player.

I reckon we could get tedesco or Locke for four years with what we spend on Hayne for two.

But still I would hate to lose him
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
84,867
Poupou has to be the only merkin who would try and justify losing Hayne. If it happens we are f**ked.

The other fifteen teams seem to go alright without Jarryd Hayne. If they can do it why not us?

Next time you whinge about our poor management of the cap, have a think about how much Hayne is likely to be on.
 

Eelementary

Post Whore
Messages
56,201
http://m.sportsfan.com.au/TOPSPORTSTORIES/Default.aspx?pg=nw&sid=6&articleId=12486

Some strong words at halftime from coach Brad Arthur was the key to a storming second-half display from Parramatta as the Eels brushed aside Penrith 32-16 on Saturday.

Leading 12-10 at the break, Arthur said he was unhappy Jarryd Hayne was only a peripheral figure in attack - something that changed after the restart with the NSW star scoring a try and creating two more to guide his side to their second win in four games.

"The things that pleased me most was our response in the second half," Arthur said.

"We completed at 95 per cent, but in the first half we didn't complete above 60 per cent.

"We spoke to the boys and said we have a talented player at the back but he's not getting the footy.

"He (Hayne) needs to get his hands on the footy, but if we are not completing our sets and turning over the ball he's not going to so it's a team effort."

Arthur's decision to recall Chris Sandow paid off with the diminutive halfback enjoying a winning return to the side.

The former South Sydney playmaker hadn't been spotted in first grade since round 17 last year and has endured problems stemming from some off-field issues.

Arthur admitted his goalkicking was a major factor in Sandow's return with the side only converting five of 13 attempts on goal before the game and he proved his worth by kicking four from six and looks sure to keep his place for the trip to Brisbane next Friday.

"He was solid, some things will need to get better, but as long as he's better next week," Arthur said.

"There was some things he had to go away and work on. He went back to Wenty and did well and obviously his goalkicking helps too."

Sandow's former Rabbitohs teammate Nathan Peats, who had a superb game for his new club, clocking up more than 50 tackles and scoring a second try in as many games, said he was delighted to get the chance to play alongside him once again.

"It's been two-and-half years since we last played together and hopefully we can keep it up for the rest of the year," Peats said.

"He's exactly the same. Chipping and chasing and going across field and trying to do it himself.

"It was good to see him play with a bit of confidence."

Panthers coach Ivan Cleary said his side deserve to lose the game on the back of their second-half performance and had no complaints with the result.

"They were just better at the back end of the game than us," Cleary said.

"They can held their heads up they played well. It was not a good night for us, that's for sure."



Seems Arthur understands how important Hayne is to this club's success.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
What a rubbish article re Hayne. If the 3rd party contracts fell through, then how is that the club's fault? The club is not meant to guarantee them, so the player must sign knowing that the payments may not be rock solid certain.

Gasnier chose to leave to chase more dollars overseas to make up for what he expected to make here. Would Jarryd go overseas or to the Dogs mid-contract, just to chase some coin? If he's still under contract and wanted to leave, wouldn't the Dogs have to pay out the value of our current contract?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top