Why bother? I could give the actual position of our silk and it would be mocked, contradicted and derided by the likes of Pou and Gutful!are you going to tell them Legal_Eel?
Why bother? I could give the actual position of our silk and it would be mocked, contradicted and derided by the likes of Pou and Gutful!are you going to tell them Legal_Eel?
Pou is an equal opportunity derider and contradicter.Why bother? I could give the actual position of our silk and it would be mocked, contradicted and derided by the likes of Pou and Gutful!
Then you are both wrongWhich is exactly what I said,
I didnt say the same thing at all, I pointed out that its federal law, not a state law and the court doesnt look at previous cases as a guide, the court is literally bound by previous decisions. It is what the law is.that old mate had a cry about and then said the same f**ken thing
I've made clear I don't know enough to have an opinion. That's why I'm asking questions. But if your answers sound like bullshit or are full of holes, don't expect me to keep my stupid mouth shut. I want to understand, and appreciate your time and effort in clarifying, even if you wish I was unable to read any of your posts.Why bother? I could give the actual position of our silk and it would be mocked, contradicted and derided by the likes of Pou and Gutful!
Previous decisions are a guide because no two situations are the same.Then you are both wrong
I didnt say the same thing at all, I pointed out that its federal law, not a state law and the court doesnt look at previous cases as a guide, the court is literally bound by previous decisions. It is what the law is.
Legaleel is one of the wisest amongst us.Previous decisions are a guide because no two situations are the same.
Legaleel is one of the wisest amongst us.
Who did we trade him for?No poaching. He is ours. Unless a better offer comes.
From what I understand he's giving Hannay this year to turn things around. After that, he would most likely test the waters if the Tit's go belly up.Did all the tino rumours die out for us?
And yet:Legaleel is one of the wisest amongst us.
I also don’t think it gets to a further hearing
It has reached court. It will be decided by the courts.
it’s how court worksAnd yet:
Yes. We would have had our lawyers (T-Boon Legal and Conveyancing) look over the release conditions very carefully and also ensured that Lomax had a lawyer sign off on it as well.it’s how court works
it motivates people to find solutions
my view is that the club probably had this application in the works for a few weeks and have kept their powder dry… once the nrl got involved the club knew they would have to go to court and enforce the validity of the release and restraint to exert authority over lomax and ensure that anyone who wants him has to pony up.
it’s my experience that you would not commence this application nor issue such a detailed and particularised press release unless you were very confident in the advice you received.
Why would Melbourne storm and Clinton schifcoske be subpoenaed ?it’s how court works
it motivates people to find solutions
my view is that the club probably had this application in the works for a few weeks and have kept their powder dry… once the nrl got involved the club knew they would have to go to court and enforce the validity of the release and restraint to exert authority over lomax and ensure that anyone who wants him has to pony up.
it’s my experience that you would not commence this application nor issue such a detailed and particularised press release unless you were very confident in the advice you received.
Possibly, but that's more a criticism of the rest of us.Legaleel is one of the wisest amongst us.
Great questionWhy would Melbourne storm and Clinton schifcoske be subpoenaed ?
Why would Melbourne storm and Clinton schifcoske be subpoenaed?
Yeah they don’t want to do work either.it’s how court works
it motivates people to find solutions
my view is that the club probably had this application in the works for a few weeks and have kept their powder dry… once the nrl got involved the club knew they would have to go to court and enforce the validity of the release and restraint to exert authority over lomax and ensure that anyone who wants him has to pony up.
it’s my experience that you would not commence this application nor issue such a detailed and particularised press release unless you were very confident in the advice you received.
I’d say (& @Tiger5150 will agree but say I’m wrong) Scum for what they were told by Lomax of his contract status, and Schifcofske for discussions with R360, mostly though they are probably fishing exercises/stuff we already knowWhy would Melbourne storm and Clinton schifcoske be subpoenaed ?
