I get what your saying about the cap, but you just don't hand out $500k contracts to spend your cap. If you need to spend your cap, front load some of your big players and have more to spend the following season. There is no way Kitone is on $500k, Tuilagi and Kitone would be on about $500-$600k combinedHis first contract with us was on the development list. Of course he wasn’t on anything like $500k. But then he was upgraded and extended seven months later (as an 80 minute starter), which was four months before he went on the open market.
The salary cap forces clubs to spend their whole cap. This is why every top 17 player is on such big contracts. You can’t just lowball every merkin and come in $2M under the cap. 97.5% of it needs to be spent.
A lot of merkins seem stuck in the paradigm when $500k was the price of an elite player. But the salary cap has doubled in ten years, and tripled since 2008.500k on the cap isn't really that much anymore
Yeah maybe not Kautoga, but Tuilagi would be for sure. I reckon $900k combined. Both regularly play 80 minutes.I get what your saying about the cap, but you just don't hand out $500k contracts to spend your cap. If you need to spend your cap, front load some of your big players and have more to spend the following season. There is no way Kitone is on $500k, Tuilagi and Kitone would be on about $500-$600k combined
I was going to suggest Kautoga may be one of the ones frontloaded, but that runs the risk of the Dylan Brown Falsity (IMO) where you get stuck always paying the player in advance of what they are worth.I get what your saying about the cap, but you just don't hand out $500k contracts to spend your cap. If you need to spend your cap, front load some of your big players and have more to spend the following season. There is no way Kitone is on $500k, Tuilagi and Kitone would be on about $500-$600k combined
They are not on $800k jointly, a reasonable amount less than that, hrt but what do I know compared the Pou and his estimations .Yeah maybe not Kautoga, but Tuilagi would be for sure. I reckon $900k combined. Both regularly play 80 minutes.
This is the only reason frontloading would work. It can't mean overpaying the player for an entire contract, because next time he's off contract it's irrelevant. His demands will be based on rival offers (even if they are 'informal'). Clubs need to maximise value within the duration of the contract.But the “ideal” scenario would be something like Kautoga is on $500k (or whatever value above what you consider he’s worth) in 2026 (when there’s not really anyone else we can sign to adequately take up cap) and then in 2027 he’s on $300k (or whatever you consider to be below his worth). Moves salary into a year where you can’t use it more effectively.
That's a good point. Hanging around junior footy tells you nothing about this stuff. You would just hear more shit rumours.but what do I know
Keep saying crap as usual, I have nothing to do with junior footy other than watching occasionally. You are a deluded fool who tries to demean other posters with your posts stating you are obviously correct as you do the math or whatever. Just for once , you are wrong, nothing more to add.That's a good point. Hanging around junior footy tells you nothing about this stuff. You would just hear more shit rumours.
This is the only reason frontloading would work. It can't mean overpaying the player for an entire contract, because next time he's off contract it's irrelevant. His demands will be based on rival offers (even if they are 'informal'). Clubs need to maximise value within the duration of the contract.
Frontloading also benefits the player because, if they are smart with their money, they can invest more earlier to take advantage of expected asset inflation. The problem for clubs is that the player might decide he is 'homesick' in later years, after his effective salary has declined, and he then gains the benefit of the frontloading while the club loses the benefit. This is why negotiations with trusted players would be very different to negotiations with strangers (most external signings).
I absolutely think it’s at risk of players misunderstanding how much a club values them. To ignore its relevance runs the risk of tHe ClUb LoWbALlEd Me!This is the only reason frontloading would work. It can't mean overpaying the player for an entire contract, because next time he's off contract it's irrelevant. His demands will be based on rival offers (even if they are 'informal'). Clubs need to maximise value within the duration of the contract.
Would you consider Kautoga a trusted player then?Frontloading also benefits the player because, if they are smart with their money, they can invest more earlier to take advantage of expected asset inflation. The problem for clubs is that the player might decide he is 'homesick' in later years, after his effective salary has declined, and he then gains the benefit of the frontloading while the club loses the benefit. This is why negotiations with trusted players would be very different to negotiations with strangers (most external signings).
And Chris Sandow.A lot of merkins seem stuck in the paradigm when $500k was the price of an elite player.
I am never obviously correct. I make assessments. We can never know whether they were correct. The fact you can't understand that points to why plenty of merkins here don't like the way I post.Keep saying crap as usual, I have nothing to do with junior footy other than watching occasionally. You are a deluded fool who tries to demean other posters with your posts stating you are obviously correct as you do the math or whatever.
Volunteering with kids' sport is God's work. I used to do it myself and I still admire it greatly. But there are people who do it for the wrong reasons and they tend to overinflate their importance and how connected they are. Be careful trusting these people. You should trust me instead.Just for once , you are wrong, nothing more to add.
By the way, what’s wrong with being interested in junior sport, always thought it was good work, not to be laughed at as you do. Just realise you are not educating anyone, just continually blowing smoke up your own rear end.
The player only needs to think the club values them more than any rivals. But I don't think any club will have success if it needs to be the highest bidder to keep its own players.I absolutely think it’s at risk of players misunderstanding how much a club values them. To ignore its relevance runs the risk of tHe ClUb LoWbALlEd Me!
In the end, a player either understands the way the salary cap motivates clubs or he doesn't. And rival clubs are also motivated the same way. If Crichton or Luai want to go somewhere more desperate, that's their business.It also runs the risk of expecting (or even operatively requiring) continuing the practice in future contracts. It may be the case that due to changing balances in squad, that the player who was frontloaded, now needs to be backloaded.
You should know this better than most, just because you see something that makes perfect sense, doesn’t make it an easy sell to the person affected.
Probably not yet but you never know. He went from a nobody to an NRL player in half a season. There was probably some euphoria and he might think it's all about Ryles and the club. There could be a few bromances involved.Would you consider Kautoga a trusted player then?
Good pointI would also say rather than just risk mitigating it to who you trust, it can also be a tool in cultivating trust with those you don’t yet.
We’re in court dealing currently with the intelligence levels of players. I can definitely foresee a player asking why they only getting $400k (of a 3 year $1.2m deal) when last contract they got $500k (of a 3 year $1.1m deal). Not all players but it only takes one disgruntled player to muddy everything.The player only needs to think the club values them more than any rivals. But I don't think any club will have success if it needs to be the highest bidder to keep its own players.
My point is more around educating the player around the circumstances.In the end, a player either understands the way the salary cap motivates clubs or he doesn't. And rival clubs are also motivated the same way. If Crichton or Luai want to go somewhere more desperate, that's their business.
Good if true.Probably not yet but you never know. He went from a nobody to an NRL player in half a season. There was probably some euphoria and he might think it's all about Ryles and the club. There could be a few bromances involved.
See @Delboy it is possibleGood point
Poustimations.They are not on $800k jointly, a reasonable amount less than that, hrt but what do I know compared the Pou and his estimations .
Surely this is part of negotiations, but they have managers to advise them on what is and isn't a good deal. If they won't listen to good advice (or just reason), do we even want them? Plenty of players would be more trouble than they’re worth.We’re in court dealing currently with the intelligence levels of players. I can definitely foresee a player asking why they only getting $400k (of a 3 year $1.2m deal) when last contract they got $500k (of a 3 year $1.1m deal). Not all players but it only takes one disgruntled player to muddy everything.
Tuilagi played 80 mins regulary? maybe in Dog years.Yeah maybe not Kautoga, but Tuilagi would be for sure. I reckon $900k combined. Both regularly play 80 minutes.
This was before he re-signed. They're not going to take money off him just because we have better forward depth now.Tuilagi played 80 mins regulary? maybe in Dog years.
Kelma played 80 mins in 3 games all season
