Tiger5150
Bench
- Messages
- 3,756
Why do you think they picked Lane to represent the seamen and seawomen of the HMAS Parramatta? You reckon its the moustache?
Why do you think they picked Lane to represent the seamen and seawomen of the HMAS Parramatta? You reckon its the moustache?
Yeah, I was pretty sure we had an Airforce one.2021 jersey commemorated 100 years of the RAAF.
Knights usually save this one for Tigers games...View attachment 86412
Nothing will beat this manly jersey.
No it’s because he has a Nike bumbag.Cause he has one eyebro
U r racist
Isn’t he from Thursday Island ?He is from the South Sea island. What cause he is coloured he is indigenous? This is extreme racism.
He is from Bundaberg, his dad's heritage is from VanuatuIsn’t he from Thursday Island ?
There you go. Sorry Mal, I think I got your heritage confused with Sam Thaiday.He is from Bundaberg, his dad's heritage is from Vanuatu
I thought he was indigenous but his father is described as South Sea Islander, so not Aboriginal or Torres Straight IslanderIsn’t he from Thursday Island ?
We were playing fine til we lost our half-back. We just don't have good enough cover there or in the backs.
*MiltonThere you go. Sorry Mal, I think I got your heritage confused with Sam Thaiday.
It's just such a shame that there aren't people at the club with the responsibility to build a 30-man roster to provide some form of depth...
I realise that losing our first-string halfback is a burden we don't need, and puts a lot of pressure on the team.
However, it doesn't excuse Arthur's selections, his puzzling tactics, or his bizarre use of our bench.
This is nothing story as his market value is what a buyer is willing to pay from a willing seller isn't it? Schuster, reportedly on $800k, is on the outer at Manly. What is his market value? Probably not more than $250-300k, certainly not what Manly are paying him. Roosters and Broncos have been underpaying for years so MV apparently doesn't apply to them as nobody questions them - only us it appears.Lomax Parra pay cut could open 'Pandora's Box'
'Might be getting paid somewhere else'wwos.nine.com.au
Who would you have picked in the first match post-Moses injury?
6. BrownWho would you have picked in the first match post-Moses injury?
I felt like Blaize was worth a punt for a couple of weeks in the role.6. Brown
7. Hands
I felt like Blaize was worth a punt for a couple of weeks in the role.
Gives him valuable experience and something to go back and learn what it takes to play grade with that small taste. Short-term pain for long term gain.
BA pulling him out now is the right call 3 games in before his confidence could completely be shot if he stayed the whole 8 weeks.
Its easier going back to Asi now then starting with Asi and realising oh shit now we have to go to a 18 year old kid.
If we won the Tigers game the whole situation where in wouldn't be as bad.
And probably where we expected to be once Moses was ruled out. 3-2 after 5 would be acceptable.
Fair enough hypothetically if Blaize didnt play the Manly game does he play the following week against the tigers game at 5/8.BA should have gone with Asi at 7 as soon as they started pre season training if he was never going to give Sanders a shot.
Now we don't have a backup 7 that has trained in that position or even played there at the start of the season.
It should have been from the Tigers game.
7.Asi
6.Brown
He played like a fullback in attack. Third in precedence of our playmakers. In defence he was one in from centre. He at least has experience defending there.Happy for Blaize to get experience in firsts at centre.
BA came out and said he’s either a centre or fullback so why on earth would we throw him into a position our head coach knows is not his future spot, in a high pressure role? Makes zero sense.
it’s not like a centre slotting in on the wing.