Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,524
Well you're the one who thinks we failed because Sanders and Talagi left.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Well you're the one who thinks we failed because Sanders and Talagi left.
Because the highlight he referenced means nothing. First he said Munster beat Tedesco in the air then he said it was Collins. Whether I watched the game or not doesn't change how relevant it is.
Because stats are data and highlights are entertainment. If my validations were as lame as you say, you wouldn't need to resort to your endless childish attempts at gotcha moments. Tedesco is still a great player and if you think he isn't, you're the one who's wrong, not me.
If assistant coaches are responsible for tactics, why does it matter? Head coaches have a coaching staff for a reason, and 'chase the collision' would've been the tactic of our previous attacking coach. Given the drop off in completion rate after Barrett joined, and the extra pressure on our defence, maybe we would've been better off sticking with the tactics that got us into the finals four straight years.
That's the only option is it? They either sign all the players and manage the salary cap or they have "NO input into the players they want"? That's the only two options in your mind? And you wonder if I had the lobotomy?
Just like Origin, I don't care and wouldn't remember.
There's obviously a correlation. The question here is about causality. Why do we suddenly have a bigger budget for NRL coaching staff and junior pathways staff? Has Ryles brought James Packer with him or has someone up the chain opened the purse strings? Have we recently completed a large infrastructure works and suddenly have cash freed up for extra full time staff perhaps?
No they don't. The CEO has final input here. If the board are inclined to interfere, they might make the final call instead. But a strong football department is expensive, and the coach doesn't set the budget and isn't responsible for developing or managing it. Standard practice is that the CEO develops the budget and the board approves it. In the context of an NRL club, the CEO will give the head coach more or less authority, depending on how much he trusts him. This will be based on his achievements, and so a rookie coach will be on a short leash. Someone like Bellamy or Bennett might be the most influential figure in the club. Someone like Ryles might just be responsible for preparing the NRL team he's given, only assisting the list management group with input around recruitment/retention. He might also be given a big coaching staff to help him prepare the team.
I never mentioned Munster you lying Bullshit artist, i said Herman Munster which is Lindsay Collins. You said Munster lol, everyone else knew i was referring too expect the fraud who didn't even watch the game.
No I said he doesn't do everything.
lol yeah apparently (from 1:50): https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2...eflects-on-his-first-few-weeks-as-head-coach/
They also 'hugely improved' after running last in 2018. It's what happens when teams shit the bed. They have a clean out and bring in new players. If you want to think some rookie coach makes all the decisions at an NRL club that's your problem. You're not Robinson Crusoe.
We have also done well under Arthur, so Ryles doing well would prove nothing. If we suck next year would it prove Ryles is shit? Only an idiot would think so.
You predicted he would tear every ligament in his knee?
Glug glug glug!! The gobbling never ends.
Norman I get but Moses....
BA has been saying 'chase the collision' for years regardless of his assistants. Go figure, according to you, he was stuck in the past by outdated tactics that failed us for one and half years until sacked.
Why wouldn't the coach have sole decision on what players they want. It is then up to R & R Committee if they can get them. You can't have R & R being independent of coach, that's just stupid thinking.
You don't think Ryles didn't have a plan? I would suggest he had it all written down in file which he presented to board when being interviewed. That's what I'd do with previous experience and letters of recommendation included and suggest that is what any decent coach would do.
As per previous, Ryles imo would've had holistic plan for organisation from juniors up, his wish list, and board gave him job on proviso plan carried out. That's my take but you'll have another for sure.
Looking forward to the season starting.
