Nutztet, I disagree
Lomax signed for less re eels.
Galvo signed for less re dogs.
Galvo saw earlier rep duties and possibly a premiership if he succeeded at the dogs which means $. Being young, both his parents and manager saw a better future in dollars by leaving...imo.
Of course being the sook he is he couldn't handle not being the top dog so he went to a proper kennel.
Lomax...well he's a epoilt brat too imo however, his Dragons contract was reportedly back-ended (bigger money in later years).
If he left early he may not have actually received those higher back-end payments so it's feasible that the Dragons may have paid a settlement to release him.....unsure.
Or they may have been happy to move that future cap burden.
Sometimes when a player exits early
there’s a negotiated payout that's not always disclosed or salary paid in advance. That doesn’t always get reported clearly either to my knowledge.
The Eels may have helped line up commercial opportunities, which I've not heard if but it does happen.
TPAs don’t always show in headline salary figures. TPA's can be substantial.
The likely reality was media reported the annual base salary was lower at Parramatta.
But that doesn’t automatically mean that his total take-home across years was lower or that he didn’t gain in structure/security/opportunity.
The contract structure, release terms and third-party deals can change the real value.
Him wanting more $ with the breakawy league became unhinged so he wants to play with the Storm so he's guaranteed to play finals every year and play centre $$$
I agree with Tiger05 in that Haas reuniting with Bennett was a huge contributing factor but I maintain that a premier prop like Haas wouldn't be low balled, that just doesn't make sense.
As I said, the big fellow could have a career ending injury and could lose millions over the years.