Some more analysis on this topic for everyone's Sunday Afternoon.
Fraud Flanno has now had the worst start (equal in terms of win loss ratio and worse in terms of points conceded) for any of our joint venture coaches since Andrew Farrar in 2000.
Surely the impact of a new coach should be enough to at least put some decent performances and defence together? If this highly credentialed premiership winning coach can't get the team off to a better start than any other coach since Farrar, that is a big red flag for me and further demonstrates his appointment over Ryles was purely to maintain the status quo.
NB - I haven't included caretaker period coaches for comparison purposes as they would not have had an off season to straighten things out.
Flanno after 5 matches - 2 wins 3 losses (130 points conceded)
Griffin after 5 matches - 4 wins 1 loss (42 points conceded)
McGregor after 5 matches - 3 wins 2 losses (58 points conceded)
Price after 5 matches - 3 wins 2 losses (90 points conceded)
Bennett after 5 matches - 4 wins 1 loss (36 points conceded)
Brown after 5 matches - 2 wins 3 losses (122 points conceded)
Farrar after 5 matches - 1 win 4 losses (149 points conceded)
Does this concern anyone?
Even our worst coaches have been able to get the team performing decently in their first season in charge after a full off season to coach bad habits our of them!
For Fraud Flanno's apologists I guess at least he isn't last in this list but you have to go back more than 20 years to find a worse start