JJ
Immortal
- Messages
- 32,407
He was very good, dynamic? Maybe, Bellamy certainly got the best out of himAdam Blair was a dynamic player for Melbourne.
He was very good, dynamic? Maybe, Bellamy certainly got the best out of himAdam Blair was a dynamic player for Melbourne.
Hahaha this is the thing that should catapult Bellamy into the hall of fameAdam Blair was a dynamic player for Melbourne.
I remember our defense was lacking, but that attack was pretty slick. Love Bluey.I will say that I believe Bluey got an absolutely raw deal from the players in that side. As you say, we actually played pretty well - round 1 we matched Manly (the premiers), Round 2 battered Parra, we were actually in the 8 as late as round 19. Lost three close games to Brisbane, Newcastle and Manly, then gave up and started getting belted by 40+
Bluey could coach, but they did him dirty by not allowing him to be an assistant first. Then the players knew they could lay down and stop playing, and blame it on him as an inexperienced coach in the NRL.
Oddly I reckon a Bluey plus Kearney pairing actually could’ve worked.I remember our defense was lacking, but that attack was pretty slick. Love Bluey.
Can’t stand the guy, but he was robbed of the Churchill in 09 in the cheating sideHe was very good, dynamic? Maybe, Bellamy certainly got the best out of him
lemme guess, Slater? Just had to turn up for unconditional praiseCan’t stand the guy, but he was robbed of the Churchill in 09 in the cheating side
Correct, everyone in the stands laughed when Slater was announcedlemme guess, Slater? Just had to turn up for unconditional praise
Thou shalt not question the performance, skill or character of Billy who redefined the play of fullbacks. This is the way.Correct, everyone in the stands laughed when Slater was announced
Was actually having this chat with someone the other day, Stewart for me, but another 3-4 years at this level and Tom gets him. He is bloody lucky to have Stewart there coaching himSlater had the longevity I guess, but redefined nothing - also, it didn't last long, but I doubt there's been better than peak Hayne - line up peak Hayne, Stewart, Tom T, Tedesco, Slater and anyone else, and I'm not picking Slater tbh
As an aside @Beavers Headgear - Stewart or Tom? FWIW I think Tom is the better player, but at club level Stewart was terrific
Yeah, Tedesco has a similar run early and has come right the last 6-7 years so hopefully that can happen in this situation, has played 152 games at 27 so plenty of time leftI reckon Tom T is on the verge of becoming underrated, or rather what his career could have been without injuries is becoming underrated. I'm not sure anyone is really better than a fit Tom T, it's just that you only get half a season at a time and he's playing injured for half of that.
Tom is phenomenal -years fade to me but with O'Connor, Hill, Innes, Matai, Lyon, the centres are quite the battle. I dislike Manly, but some of that talent is off the leash - not home grown of courseWas actually having this chat with someone the other day, Stewart for me, but another 3-4 years at this level and Tom gets him. He is bloody lucky to have Stewart there coaching him
pick a side from 1990 onwards and Tom can play wing or centre in the same side. All the old timers say they don’t compare to Eadie though. Ridge isn’t a bad number 4 option either, been pretty lucky
Certainly did at the Warriors. I've read Beleagured and the newer Warriors book ('Celebrating' 25 Years) and I don't have a lot of memories from that 97-99 period (and just beyond) but it seems like Ridge was a pretty destructive influence here.Ridge never let anyone down at Manly
I was very deliberate in my phrasing ...Certainly did at the Warriors. I've read Beleagured and the newer Warriors book ('Celebrating' 25 Years) and I don't have a lot of memories from that 97-99 period (and just beyond) but it seems like Ridge was a pretty destructive influence here.
Anyone who may stumble onto his podcast, as well...please do yourself a favour and don't listen to it. It is the worst rubbish I've ever had the misfortune of wasting time on.
Eric Grothe for Eels might have fit that profile. How many wingers that came before him were his size and power?In all seriousness, I do get tired of the whole ‘he redefined how the position is’ bollocks…. Someone suggested Steve Walters the other day, great player, but surely Elias is the better candidate for that label if it must be used. Great players are great players, but fullbacks were doing things Slater did before he arrived, he was just better at most…. But just without giving it much though, Mullins was probably a more dangerous runner (so was Inglis and at one point it was suggested he should be Storm fullback), Lockyer a better more dangerous ball player, many were better defenders, and many were great communicators on defence etc etc
He was certainly different in that era, so yeah he might be the closest. I think Ben Elias is perhaps another. But I just don't get the argument with Slater at all - he was great, no mistake, but I don't see a fundamental shift or difference about himEric Grothe for Eels might have fit that profile. How many wingers that came before him were his size and power?