I'd hate to see Dufty left out for an extended period. If you watch some of Norman's hi-lite reels you'll notice his best attribute is a very accurate short kicking game ( especially close to the opposition try - line ) which would benefit a speedster like Dufty - not only close to the line but back up field as well.
Dufty must be at or near the top in tackle breaks, metres gained and line breaks for the team not to mention top try scorer, can we afford to just drop him to seconds and forgo all that. With the loss of so much experience already at the back after the loss of Nightie and Mcdonald ( our other top metre eater ) I wouldn't be making more unnecessary changes. Widdop isn't going to provide any of the stats Dufty can at the back apart from maybe stopping a try or two that Dufty couldn't.
Smart post.
The FB job is either Dufty or Dufty (can't really see any other options at the moment).
Norman like Widdop & Hunt needs to get his hands on the ball as much as possible especially within 30 meters of the try line and that isn't going to happen from FB.
Smart teams will find ways to nullify Widdop and or Norman if they are at the back and neither one of them is as dangerous as Dufty in broken field play.
If Norman clicks at our club Dufty could have an enormous year in attack and it's over to Mc Fookkuckle to work out how shut down his exposure in defence and I suggest not having Latimore miss tackles in the middle and not having Aitken running in out of the defensive line would be a very good start and it would also be helpful if Hunt learnt how to tackle properly rather than jumping up and being pushed off as he does at times.
We have a bit of a square peg in a round hole scenario with 3 quality halves but pushing 1 to FB doesn't seem the logical answer in my book.