Sticky or Flanno ???????

[newysharksfan]

With the change of style who has been coaching us for the last month Sticky or Flanno?
I hope Gus is eating his words.
Plenty of people would pay to watch the Sharkies on tonights performance.

 

[roboshark]

not sure but I have sticky flannos after that performance

 

[azzah72]

It's Ricky but it's a little too late, we might make a charge for the finals this year, we might not but fact remains that ricky has been stubborn for 4 years and it took him to now to finally swallow his pride and the results are showing.

I don't care but because I'm Finally enjoying it.

 

[Inferno]

Nah clearly the players wrested control after Sticky snatched it back after the Parra game.

 

[Frailty]

Stuart was in the Tele, quoted as saying he plans to drop Gardner back into Toyota Cup in a couple of weeks. If this is the case - I'm glad we got rid of the pharkwit.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Stuart was in the Tele, quoted as saying he plans to drop Gardner back into Toyota Cup in a couple of weeks. If this is the case - I'm glad we got rid of the pharkwit.

Ohh frailty, have you got your Gards photo up on your wall yet?

hahaha .

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Can anybody tell me what Ricky was doing interrupting Flanno & the players during half time last night?

 

[newysharksfan]

I think if Sticky puts Gardner back to the Toyota Cup we will be going for the pitchforks.
There is no way

 

[Qld Shark]

I think if Sticky puts Gardner back to the Toyota Cup we will be going for the pitchforks.
There is no way

Why? I reckon he should give Kelly another crack.
Run QS these guys have no sense of humour

 

[coolumsharkie]

sh*t stiring. Sticky style.

 

[millersnose]

"shall we throw it round?"

"no..stick to the game plan"

 

[blacktip-reefy]

"shall we throw it round?"

"no..stick to the game plan"

Did we throw it around against the Roosters?
Which "game plan/style" did we use?
Who's was it?

 

[Generalzod]

It's a mystery! It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma!

 

[carcharias]

I wonder if they were on the valium before the game as well.

 

[DJShaksta]

Where's Redders and SSB? They'll know for sure!

 

[millersnose]

Did we throw it around against the Roosters?

yes to great effect

Which "game plan/style" did we use?

the one where we took risks in attack, spread the ball and used initiative in attack which fragmented the defence before them

it was a decentralised gp more likely to exploit the talents of a group of youngsters rather than a hard nose gp which suited the very experienced roosters of 2002

Who's was it?

if i had to guess it was ricky under pressure as the board was clearly under the impression the previous one didnt work

 

[Quigs]

Where's Redders and SSB? They'll know for sure!

BUSTRIKE ... the busses are down.

They chartered a train to bring em down, it's on its way

Cheers
Declared Idiot #88
Quigs

 

[blacktip-reefy]

yes to great effect

Maybe you could explain why the offload rate actually dropped for Roosters game compared to the games where we we actually lost. in fact, the only constants seems to be comparing the games that we won, to the games we lost is the following;
1: completion rate over 80%
2: Error rate below opposition
3: A fair shake of the referee/video 50/50 callls

the one where we took risks in attack, spread the ball and used initiative in attack which fragmented the defence before them

after watching replays of a few game earlier in the year, I saw the same risks & the same ball movement. Unfortunately what i also saw was dropped ball at critical times during those movements.

it was a decentralised gp more likely to exploit the talents of a group of youngsters rather than a hard nose gp which suited the very experienced roosters of 2002

I thought it was just playing what was in front of them, which was the worst defensive line I have seen all year.

if i had to guess it was ricky under pressure as the board was clearly under the impression the previous one didnt work

I would say it was Rickys. Just doing what Ricky does best & that is coming up with game plan adjustments to suit the conditions, the team & specific situations. it seems that Ricks game plans work, all of them, if the above 3 conditions are met.

 

[millersnose]

Maybe you could explain why the offload rate actually dropped for Roosters game compared to the games where we we actually lost. in fact, the only constants seems to be comparing the games that we won, to the games we lost is the following;
1: completion rate over 80%
2: Error rate below opposition
3: A fair shake of the referee/video 50/50 callls







after watching replays of a few game earlier in the year, I saw the same risks & the same ball movement. Unfortunately what i also saw was dropped ball at critical times during those movements.

sure

anticipation

it was trained for clearly whereas before if an offload happened it was a total surprise - when a long pass happened no one was there

I thought it was just playing what was in front of them, which was the worst defensive line I have seen all year.

i do not deny that

I would say it was Rickys. Just doing what Ricky does best & that is coming up with game plan adjustments to suit the conditions, the team & specific situations. it seems that Ricks game plans work, all of them, if the above 3 conditions are met.

i think you would be in the minority with such a view

 

[blacktip-reefy]

i think you would be in the minority with such a view

I think on a forum, I would be. But I wouldn't be, where it matters the most. On the training paddock.