What about if we add errors into the equation?
Very interesting table you have there Frenzy.
There are stats here that supports the "we are passing and attacking more side of things" and stats that support the Reefy side "we are playing the same but just executing better." And then there are stats that go against both sides of the argument.
We had two wins with an error rate that was our 2nd and 3rd worse of any match. But what was the error rate of our opposition? I bet it was worse.
We have had our biggest win when we had our least amount of errors however.
Our error rate has improved in the last 4 matches compared to our first 4 matches.
Definately our passing rate is up in the last 4 games which has resulted in more enjoyable footy to watch and more "in" the game but poor ref decisions and poor playmaking decisions cruelled us against the Panthers and Broncos unlike our thrashings earlier in the season where we just played boring defensive football and quickly lost touch and showed little enthusiasm.
There is definately no correlation to offloads compared to passing rates. You may say it does when you look at the last Broncos and Eels games but then look at our wins against the Roosters and the Knights. Low offload rate and a high passing game.
Most of our biggest losses also correspond with a very low passing game.
So my final verdict from all this would be play an adventurous but calculated passing game and have fewer errors than the opposition and you have a bloody good chance of being competitive and bloody winning.