Sunday Roast

[mulvihill]

Just got an email from Andrew Voss. They will be showing Harrigan's never been seen before and never been seen since penalty against McGuire in the 89 GF and comparing it to Aaron Payne's try 2 weeks ago against Penrith. I asked them to get Mr I KNow everything on to justify his decision given he loves getting his mug on the box

 

[Ninja]

Can you ask them to sack Phil Gould while youre at it

 

[mulvihill]

I don't mind Gus. One of the best football brains around

 

[chopsy_05]

They played it. Good to see the whole panel agree!

 

[mulvihill]

Robbed. And I got a warning for daring to insult Harrigan. Harrigan's a prick for 89 end of story

 

[innsaneink]

It got about 30 times the attention it deserved - 30 seconds.

 

[simon says]

Most bullsh*t decision of all time......

 

[innsaneink]

17 years...time to 'move on' eh? :lol:

 

[simon says]

Never forget 1909 and 89....lest we forget.

 

[mulvihill]

All agreed the decision was wrong

Cost us a grand final

Ask Freeman, Benny, Sirro, Blocker, Junior about that call and they'll all tell you their thoughts on Harrigan. He gave Canberra that comp end of.

 

[hrundi99]

Build a bridge...

If Balmain were good enough they would have won.

Canberra proved their status with the win against Penrith the following year, etc.

 

[mulvihill]

whilst rorting the cap

 

[westie]

Build a bridge...

If Balmain were good enough they would have won.

Canberra proved their status with the win against Penrith the following year, etc.

This is the bit I find relevant. One dodgy penalty went against Balmain... they blew their lead.. they blew chances to put it beyond doubt... they blew the game. Sure... it was a poor discision... but if they were good enough, they would have coped.

Love,

westie

 

[DA]

That was MY email regarding the Chinese Bun Festival and Parramatta

 

[mulvihill]

What garbage
It gave them the ball with 6 tackles in our 20 when it should have been in our hands on their 20. You utter pleb. It has nothing to do with being good enough and everyting to do with being rorted by the egomaniacal prick that is harrigan

 

[innsaneink]

Build a bridge...

If Balmain were good enough they would have won.

Canberra proved their status with the win against Penrith the following year, etc.

Just dont mention 1909....=;

 

[hrundi99]

whilst rorting the cap

Yes by $30k due to unexpected rep bonuses.

You're a sour prick Mulv. Do you watch the 89 GF every week and cry into your beer nuts, sticking pins into your Harrigan voodoo doll? No...?

 

[hrundi99]

What garbage
It gave them the ball with 6 tackles in our 20 when it should have been in our hands on their 20. You utter pleb. It has nothing to do with being good enough and everyting to do with being rorted by the egomaniacal prick that is harrigan

Case in point...

 

[Ninja]

I understand the pain you Balmain boys feel. I am still devastated at the 63 Grand Final and I wasnt even born. We were robbed too.

Never understood the nrl trophy. Why was Arthur hugging Norm. He should have been over strangling Darcy Lawler.

 

[mulvihill]

Was darcy as bent as harrigan.