Gary Gutful
Post Whore
- Messages
- 51,922
Deadshit nuffy…I’m going to use that one.
Right, so this was a roster shortfall that you, a deadshit nuffy, was aware of that Brad Arthur only just figured out?
How many backup hookers are there who are good enough to get on the field in one of the hardest, most important positions on the field? Are there enough for every club to have one? Do you think the clubs without one aren't aware they need one? Are they maybe struggling to get their top 17 right before worrying about getting the best backups at a reasonable price?
Just because there's a problem doesnt mean it can be fixed instantly. It certainly doesn't mean the people responsible for fixing it are unaware. They don't live in a perfect world where every problem can be solved simultaneously. Only sports fans and political pundits live in such a world.
I remember it clearly. There was a counter view put forward, but it certainly wasn’t an attack. You always assume its personal.there were plenty of ’deadset Nuffies’ calling for players to be rested, the need to find a back up hooker, players to be dropped and players to be blooded in the regular season. Those nuffies then got attacked, by people like yourself. When we did eventually lose to south’s, I was sick of hearing we lost because we have to blood 3 players, we had injuries, we had lack of experience and so on.
it’s good to see BA is catching on. maybe others here will too.
I prefer 'wood duck'Deadshit nuffy…I’m going to use that one.
If a player isn't ready there's no point throwing him into first grade if he's not needed. Likewise, you can't drop a player if there isn't someone to replace him. If we had played too many reserve graders through the year we might've missed the top four.there were plenty of ’deadset Nuffies’ calling for players to be rested, the need to find a back up hooker, players to be dropped and players to be blooded in the regular season.
Because you're criticising things you don't understand. It's the only thing in life that pisses me off.Those nuffies then got attacked, by people like yourself.
Haze Dunster (our only debutant in the finals) wasn't the reason we lost against Souths. It wouldn't have mattered how many games he played last year. We lost because three of our top four outside backs were missing. One of their replacements, Takairangi, had 150+ NRL games. He just lacked the talent (like Dunster) to make up for the loss of Mennings and Ferguson. Gennings had a solid game in attack at least.When we did eventually lose to south’s, I was sick of hearing we lost because we have to blood 3 players, we had injuries, we had lack of experience and so on.
If a player isn't ready there's no point throwing him into first grade if he's not needed. Likewise, you can't drop a player if there isn't someone to replace him. If we had played too many reserve graders through the year we might've missed the top four.
Because you're criticising things you don't understand. It's the only thing in life that pisses me off.
Haze Dunster (our only debutant in the finals) wasn't the reason we lost against Souths. It wouldn't have mattered how many games he played last year. We lost because three of our top four outside backs were missing. One of their replacements, Takairangi, had 150+ NRL games. He just lacked the talent (like Dunster) to make up for the loss of Mennings and Ferguson. Gennings had a solid game in attack at least.
Where we lacked experience wasn't the extra two or three games we could've given to Dunster (which we might've lost and missed the top four) but in the total lack of big game experience across the whole squad. Our two most experienced players in that regard (finals and Origin) by far were Mennings and Ferguson. Both missing from the game against Souths.
I watched this on replay and it then became very obvious that Roach was working towards positioning his support, Rankin, who he gave a clear run to the line. Roach ran at a pace required for the set up. Looked very different from my spot in the grandstand. Well spotted @hindy111Roach made one strong run to set up Rankins (I think) try but I was surprised by his lack of speed. I do watch from behind the posts, club end though so I'm not terribly reliable in that regard. Any comments on his speed? I thought Lussick was far more impressive last week than Roach.