Team v Dragons

[N.C.]

Last year, the year before, etc etc, I would have said we'll really miss him at such a crucial point in the season.

This year, not so much.

We've got good cover, we'll be right.

 

[benched tiger]

Galloway usually starts off well but as soon as he is interchanged he seems to go missing,he has talent and could play SOO if IMO he increases his involvement. Also have to agree with Tigerm Keith appears to be injury prone.

 

[madunit]

Since being at the Tigers, Keith has played

2006 - 12 of a possible 24 games
2007 - 17 of a possible 24 games
2008 - 18 of a possible 24 games
2009 - 15 of a possible 24 games
2010 - 20 of a possible 27 games
2011 - 9 of a possible 12 games

2006-2011 - 91 games of a possible 135 games

 

[Tigerm]

Since being at the Tigers, Keith has played

2006 - 12 of a possible 24 games
2007 - 17 of a possible 24 games
2008 - 18 of a possible 24 games
2009 - 15 of a possible 24 games
2010 - 20 of a possible 27 games
2011 - 9 of a possible 12 games

2006-2011 - 91 games of a possible 135 games

Good work MU, what's your thoughts on them. Is this a lot for a Front Rower?
2006 availability = 50%
2007 = 71%
2008 = 75%
2009 = 63%
2010 = 74%
2011 = 75% to date.
All games = 67%

It seems ordinary, but........ I have nothing to compare it to.

 

[Tigers Tale]

I'd like to see a comparison to players like Steve Price or Glen Lazarus. May be talking through my hat but they always seemed to be up for a game, even if slightly injured.

 

[N.C.]

Do those stats cover injury related omissions, or first-grade starts? Galloway spent a lot of his time in BRET during his first couple of seasons. He's only really been a regular in the starting squad since about 2009 - or 2008? So those stats don't really reflect injuries, I'm thinking...

 

[andrew9148]

You would think 80% would be good. So he is off that a bit.