The Case for Adelaide.....

[Matt_CBY]

Nor can I, not because they couldn’t be but because RL remains a myopic sport run by people who lack any great vision.

Your arrogance knows no bounds. Typical.

 

[AdelaideSharky]

Your arrogance knows no bounds. Typical.

Mate, no offence but as much of a clown that PR is I have more respect for him than I do for you.

Every single post you've made lately is having a go at people.

I get it life may be tough for you and you need an outlet to hide behind to get your passive aggressive frustrations out but you've become over the top.

Calm the f**k down and get a hold of yourself.

 

[Matt_CBY]

Mate, no offence but as much of a clown that PR is I have more respect for him than I do for you.

Every single post you've made lately is having a go at people.

I get it life may be tough for you and you need an outlet to hide behind to get your passive aggressive frustrations out but you've become over the top.

Calm the f**k down and get a hold of yourself.

You shouldn’t give advise you can’t uphold yourself champion.

I’m also not hiding behind anything. In fact I’m one of a few people on here who volunteer my name “Adelaide Sharky”.

Just like the arrogant one has me on ignore. I’ve now got you on ignore.

 

[AdelaideSharky]

You shouldn’t give advise you can’t uphold yourself champion.

I’m also not hiding behind anything. In fact I’m one of a few people on here who volunteer my name “Adelaide Sharky”.

Just like the arrogant one has me on ignore. I’ve now got you on ignore.

No skin off my nose, you've done me a favour.

 

[İzmir Zaferi]

I think the most logical opportunity for South Australia would be to go into a dual - city representation with the Sharks.

Southern Sharks

8 games - Cronulla
4 - 5 games - Adelaide

Sharks desperately need to broaden their appeal and breadth.

Sharks is a flexible and attractive brand with relevance to the Adelaide narrative.

By creating an agreement with other Sydney teams they can retain games in Sydney, both in Cronulla and in wider Sydney whilst broaden their casual supporter base by a million.

Even if they averaged ten thousand fans in Adelaide, that would be ten thousand new fans with additional merchandise and corporate potential.

Given potential for investment from the South Australian government as well there is huge potential with limited risk.

To motivate such a move the NRL should provide an annual grant top up for ten years with a binding contract with the South Australian government, including forms of sponsorship.

 

[BuffaloRules]

Nor can I, not because they couldn’t be but because RL remains a myopic sport run by people who lack any great vision.

Maybe your Super League can give PVL some lessons on successful expansion into hostile areas dominated by another sport…

Start with London maybe ?

 

[BuffaloRules]

I think the most logical opportunity for South Australia would be to go into a dual - city representation with the Sharks.

Southern Sharks

8 games - Cronulla
4 - 5 games - Adelaide

Sharks desperately need to broaden their appeal and breadth.

Sharks is a flexible and attractive brand with relevance to the Adelaide narrative.

By creating an agreement with other Sydney teams they can retain games in Sydney, both in Cronulla and in wider Sydney whilst broaden their casual supporter base by a million.

Even if they averaged ten thousand fans in Adelaide, that would be ten thousand new fans with additional merchandise and corporate potential.

Given potential for investment from the South Australian government as well there is huge potential with limited risk.

To motivate such a move the NRL should provide an annual grant top up for ten years with a binding contract with the South Australian government, including forms of sponsorship.

Hi Izmir … I’m not sure the Adelaide people will get behind a part time team from Sydney

 

[AdelaideSharky]

I think the most logical opportunity for South Australia would be to go into a dual - city representation with the Sharks.

Southern Sharks

8 games - Cronulla
4 - 5 games - Adelaide

Sharks desperately need to broaden their appeal and breadth.

Sharks is a flexible and attractive brand with relevance to the Adelaide narrative.

By creating an agreement with other Sydney teams they can retain games in Sydney, both in Cronulla and in wider Sydney whilst broaden their casual supporter base by a million.

Even if they averaged ten thousand fans in Adelaide, that would be ten thousand new fans with additional merchandise and corporate potential.

Given potential for investment from the South Australian government as well there is huge potential with limited risk.

To motivate such a move the NRL should provide an annual grant top up for ten years with a binding contract with the South Australian government, including forms of sponsorship.

Been done.

We had an 3 year agreement with the SA government in 2009 to take games here in the wake of that Four Corners hitjob and the Tony Zappia scandal and it lasted a year after our fans complained of losing out on home games so the club walked away from the deal and Canterbury temporarily stepped in to fill the deal.

The Roosters also had that deal to play a game against Melbourne at Adelaide Oval (I went to both games as I had already moved here by then) and they too decided not to renew that deal.

Like I said in this thread there will not be a current existing club in the competition that will relocate anywhere.

If we are to get a team here again it'll either be a reborn Adelaide Rams or an old club like Newtown that merges with an Adelaide consortium (like Norths did with Perth).

 

[AdelaideSharky]

Hi Izmir … I’m not sure the Adelaide people will get behind a part time team from Sydney

We won't,

And in my case certainly not my own.

As I said in my previous post if we get a team here again it'll either be a reborn Adelaide Rams or a merger with an old team like Newtown.

Plus there's a few issues at play, where to base the team.

Adelaide Oval is now far too big now being twice the size it was during the Rams' days and Coopers Stadium is far too small capacity wise and the pitch is too small as it's primary tenant is football.

If you ever have watched Super League games their in-goals are far too small.

The big issue with upgrading Coopers is it is shoehorned in by Manton & Holden Streets and one can't move the road plus there's a heritage listed old church building behind the Southern Grandstand that Adelaide United currently uses as a storeroom.

 

[BuffaloRules]

We won't,

And in my case certainly not my own.

As I said in my previous post if we get a team here again it'll either be a reborn Adelaide Rams or a merger with an old team like Newtown.

Plus there's a few issues at play, where to base the team.

Adelaide Oval is now far too big now being twice the size it was during the Rams' days and Coopers Stadium is far too small capacity wise and the pitch is too small as it's primary tenant is football.

If you ever have watched Super League games their in-goals are far too small.

The big issue with upgrading Coopers is it is shoehorned in by Manton & Holden Streets and one can't move the road plus there's a heritage listed old church building behind the Southern Grandstand that Adelaide United currently uses as a storeroom.

Is there any plans for a new rectangle stadium ?

 

[AdelaideSharky]

Is there any plans for a new rectangle stadium ?

Very highly doubt it.

Our current premier is all over the big events stuff (ie. AFL Gather Round, Adelaide 500 V8 car racing, LIV Golf etc.) but unless Adelaide United start packing out Coopers on a weekly basis I highly doubt we'll be getting a new rectangular stadium.

Plus they only just did a refurb of Coopers by extending the Eastern Grandstand for the recent Womens football World Cup.

Even if they did the same with the northern stand and southern stand the capacity would only be the same as some current clubs in Sydney.

 

[BuffaloRules]

Very highly doubt it.

Our current premier is all over the big events stuff but unless Adelaide United start packing out Coopers on a weekly basis I highly doubt we'll be getting a new rectangular stadium.

Plus they only just did a refurb of Coopers by extending the Eastern Grandstand for the recent Womens football World Cup.

Even if they did the same with the northern stand and southern stand the capacity would only be the same as some current clubs in Sydney.

Obviously they are behind the 8 ball without a proper stadium …

The NRL has dragged the chain on expansion, and I’m sure that you can see for yourself that there are a few other places ahead of Adelaide in the queue to get into the comp that are more league “friendly “..

I think the main push for a team has to come from within… like we have seen in Perth to some extent…if Perth is successful and here to stay then Adelaide will be the only major city in Aust without a team …

 

[AdelaideSharky]

Obviously they are behind the 8 ball without a proper stadium …

The NRL has dragged the chain on expansion, and I’m sure that you can see for yourself that there are a few other places ahead of Adelaide in the queue to get into the comp that are more league “friendly “..

I think the main push for a team has to come from within… like we have seen in Perth to some extent…if Perth is successful and here to stay then Adelaide will be the only major city in Aust without a team …

Perth getting in may be the catalyst for us moving towards getting a team as there's the FOMO factor at play.

The big issue we have here that Perth doesn't is we don't have a very large NSW/Qld interstate expat (I am one obviously) community and we don't have the large English & Kiwi community that Perth has here.

We're still a city full of pensioners and public servants (the former still goes on the John Hopoate scandal when referring to our game).

 

[MugaB]

I think the most logical opportunity for South Australia would be to go into a dual - city representation with the Sharks.

Southern Sharks

8 games - Cronulla
4 - 5 games - Adelaide

Sharks desperately need to broaden their appeal and breadth.

Rabbitohs is a better fit to be honest, they are already called Souths...
Sharks are fine where they are, souths, roosters, Tigers and bulldogs are all too close to one another, ditch souths and they are all somewhat spaced out a bit more

 

[Matt_CBY]

Rabbitohs is a better fit to be honest, they are already called Souths...
Sharks are fine where they are, souths, roosters, Tigers and bulldogs are all too close to one another, ditch souths and they are all somewhat spaced out a bit more

Oh no

 

[MugaB]

Oh no

Oh yes... let's see if they REALLY are the darlings of the league