gong_eagle
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,655
Statistics tell tale of a good, old-fashioned flogging
Phil Gould | June 9, 2008
THE ANALYST
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/new...hioned-flogging/2008/06/08/1212863453911.html
The Roosters lost yesterday's game at Brookvale Oval because they were intimidated out of the contest by the Manly forwards. Basically, they wet their pants.
Sorry for the language; but as an old football coach my vocabulary is pretty limited when it comes to stating the bleeding obvious.
This game was over after only six minutes.
You can study all the statistics you like from the remaining 74 minutes of the game. They will only tell you how it happened. It takes a much deeper examination to explain why the Roosters were blown off the park.
For instance, statistics will reveal the Roosters were forced to make over 100 more tackles than their opponents during the game.
They turned the ball over before tackle two on no fewer than nine occasions.
The Roosters had five line drop-outs, so intense was Manly's kick-chase pressure.
They also gifted Manly six restarts of the tackle count because they touched the ball while in defence. They ran into touch, threw forward passes, missed tackles and even passed the ball to their rivals.
So dominant were the Sea Eagles in all facets of the game that in the first 50 minutes of play, only nine minutes of it was in Manly's half.
Studying statistics from a game of football though, is a bit like a forensic scientist studying a murder scene.
These vital shreds of evidence can tell you how the victim was murdered. DNA analysis can even lead them to who was responsible.
However, only the psychologists can determine the motivation and why this murder actually occurred.
Anyway, back to the first six minutes of the match.
It began like any other game, with both teams dutifully going about the job of advancing the ball before a good kick downfield in the obligatory contest of "forcings-back".
However, this was the most one-sided game of "forcings-back" I've ever seen.
Manly totally dominated the Roosters.
During this short, but decisive, period both teams had three sets of six with the ball.
Every time the Roosters had possession they made less and less ground with the ball.
The Manly forwards raced up in numbers and gang-tackled the younger Roosters, who looked tentative and lost.
Each time the Roosters got to tackle five, they were forced to kick from deeper and deeper inside their own half.
Their kickers were under so much pressure that their kicks made less ground each time.
When Manly got the ball their big forwards, led by Brent Kite and Josh Perry, rumbled over the advantage line like semi-trailers hurtling down the motorway.
They bent the Roosters back with every charge and when they got to their fifth-tackle kick, they were able belt the ball downfield like it was fired from a cannon. It forced the Roosters further and further back, until they pinned them in-goal and got a repeat set. This was only the sixth minute of the contest but the body language on the shell-shocked Roosters following Manly's blitzkrieg was an indication of what was to happen for the rest of the afternoon. The game was over right there.
To their credit the Roosters tried to rally in defence and kept the deficit low until half time, before the floodgates opened in the second half and the score blew out.
That's how it happened.
The who part is easy.
The Manly forwards did it.
The Roosters will need to have their players questioned by the club psychiatrist to find out why it happened.
Phil Gould | June 9, 2008
THE ANALYST
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/new...hioned-flogging/2008/06/08/1212863453911.html
The Roosters lost yesterday's game at Brookvale Oval because they were intimidated out of the contest by the Manly forwards. Basically, they wet their pants.
Sorry for the language; but as an old football coach my vocabulary is pretty limited when it comes to stating the bleeding obvious.
This game was over after only six minutes.
You can study all the statistics you like from the remaining 74 minutes of the game. They will only tell you how it happened. It takes a much deeper examination to explain why the Roosters were blown off the park.
For instance, statistics will reveal the Roosters were forced to make over 100 more tackles than their opponents during the game.
They turned the ball over before tackle two on no fewer than nine occasions.
The Roosters had five line drop-outs, so intense was Manly's kick-chase pressure.
They also gifted Manly six restarts of the tackle count because they touched the ball while in defence. They ran into touch, threw forward passes, missed tackles and even passed the ball to their rivals.
So dominant were the Sea Eagles in all facets of the game that in the first 50 minutes of play, only nine minutes of it was in Manly's half.
Studying statistics from a game of football though, is a bit like a forensic scientist studying a murder scene.
These vital shreds of evidence can tell you how the victim was murdered. DNA analysis can even lead them to who was responsible.
However, only the psychologists can determine the motivation and why this murder actually occurred.
Anyway, back to the first six minutes of the match.
It began like any other game, with both teams dutifully going about the job of advancing the ball before a good kick downfield in the obligatory contest of "forcings-back".
However, this was the most one-sided game of "forcings-back" I've ever seen.
Manly totally dominated the Roosters.
During this short, but decisive, period both teams had three sets of six with the ball.
Every time the Roosters had possession they made less and less ground with the ball.
The Manly forwards raced up in numbers and gang-tackled the younger Roosters, who looked tentative and lost.
Each time the Roosters got to tackle five, they were forced to kick from deeper and deeper inside their own half.
Their kickers were under so much pressure that their kicks made less ground each time.
When Manly got the ball their big forwards, led by Brent Kite and Josh Perry, rumbled over the advantage line like semi-trailers hurtling down the motorway.
They bent the Roosters back with every charge and when they got to their fifth-tackle kick, they were able belt the ball downfield like it was fired from a cannon. It forced the Roosters further and further back, until they pinned them in-goal and got a repeat set. This was only the sixth minute of the contest but the body language on the shell-shocked Roosters following Manly's blitzkrieg was an indication of what was to happen for the rest of the afternoon. The game was over right there.
To their credit the Roosters tried to rally in defence and kept the deficit low until half time, before the floodgates opened in the second half and the score blew out.
That's how it happened.
The who part is easy.
The Manly forwards did it.
The Roosters will need to have their players questioned by the club psychiatrist to find out why it happened.