Paragraphing.
Punctuation.
:lol:
I was joshing before, but you truly are an imbecile of gargantuan proportions.
Paragraphing? Be more specific because those two sentences are fine as one paragraph.
As you have indicated in markups, I infer that you want the comma deleted, when actually there should be another comma preceding "..., in Mel, doing the job." But that may be a slip of you not using enough bold, like a typographical error of not including another comma. It may be better English yet to have written actively along the lines of "right person doing the job, in Mel", but I think its clearer to have Mel identified after "right person". Removing the commas leaves it open for any... well I'll just say that ommited comma ambiguity type humour will not necessarily be appreciated here by all.
So as an editor and proof reader - you're letting me down.
You're right that I am prone to error with "its" but its not because of any laziness on learning the rule. I follow the rule in formal writing that it is never good English to write "it's" in my all my writing. I am aware of the different meaning of "it's" and "its", but I do make typographical errors of possessive pronoun "its" instead of writing out "it is".
An imbecile on a spectrum of stupidy is between idiot (0-25 iq) and moron (51-70 iq). The worst proportion of being an imbecile on the scale would be an iq of 26, which is still more intelligent than an idiot who expresses himself in cliches, thinks "Ms" needs to be followed by a period, hyphenates adverbs ending in "ly" (while announcing the perfection of their writing in another post where the grammar led to this spat), writes in context to a second person as though he is possibly pregnant and as though an ellipsis is a plural. All this after contriving an ungrammatical "get" into a joke in place of "got". You're okay at proofreading in finding errors, but your written expression leaves more to be desired than perhaps you realise. I know mine isn't my strongest suit.
