What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WA BEARS

Chief_Chujo

Chief_Chujo

First Grade
Messages
8,131
Mother Nature's Son said:
So good enough for the WA Gov`t but not good enough for the NRL. Looks like everybody`s on different pages here.
Click to expand...

It's almost like the parties have different stakes in the game. A poorly thought out Perth ends with a dead club, another black eye on the game and could shut the state off from expansion forever. For the politicians, whatever the outcome, its just fodder in the election cycle.
 
W

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,693
Chief_Chujo said:
It's almost like the parties have different stakes in the game. A poorly thought out Perth ends with a dead club, another black eye on the game and could shut the state off from expansion forever. For the politicians, whatever the outcome, its just fodder in the election cycle.
Click to expand...
It will still have wa investors

Just probably not Cummins

The wa govt doesn’t care they just want the inbound tourism
 
B

Bukowski

Bench
Messages
2,659
Chief_Chujo said:
It's almost like the parties have different stakes in the game. A poorly thought out Perth ends with a dead club, another black eye on the game and could shut the state off from expansion forever. For the politicians, whatever the outcome, its just fodder in the election cycle.
Click to expand...
It was poorly thought out to start with from PLV.
 
B

Bukowski

Bench
Messages
2,659
Chief_Chujo said:
He asked for expansion tenders and rejected one of them. How is that poorly thought out?
Click to expand...
He placed a non negotiatable onto 1 bid and failed to tell them them they would need a license fee.

His fingerprints are all over the failed bid so he needs to take responsibility for his part.
 
Chief_Chujo

Chief_Chujo

First Grade
Messages
8,131
Bukowski said:
He placed a non negotiatable onto 1 bid and failed to tell them them they would need a license fee.

His fingerprints are all over the failed bid so he needs to take responsibility for his part.
Click to expand...

They were told a license fee would need to be paid during the tender process. Cummins was a genius and put zero thinking he had pulled a swifty. f**k he could have put $1mil or even $500k and they could be negotiating right now. Imagine the disrespect and arrogance, after you've been told that a license fee is necessary, to put a donut to the question. It's no wonder the ARLC walked way.

The non-negotiable of the Bears is based on the success of the Swans/Lions relocation to expansion areas. Again, the ARLC have a lot at stake in expanding west.
 
W

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,693
Chief_Chujo said:
They were told a license fee would need to be paid during the tender process. Cummins was a genius and put zero thinking he had pulled a swifty. f**k he could have put $1mil or even $500k and they could be negotiating right now. Imagine the disrespect and arrogance, after you've been told that a license fee is necessary, to put a donut to the question. It's no wonder the ARLC walked way.

The non-negotiable of the Bears is based on the success of the Swans/Lions relocation to expansion areas. Again, the ARLC have a lot at stake in expanding west.
Click to expand...
He also didn’t tell the arl during negotiations they would need Sydney investors and one of those would be someone who had been sacked by the nrl
 
Chief_Chujo

Chief_Chujo

First Grade
Messages
8,131
Bukowski said:
If you think a relocation of the bears to Perth is a good idea. It's not, and this is the result. He's scrambling for new investors . LOL.
Click to expand...
I'm sure people said the same with the Swans and Lions. Reality is, every expansion into dominant heartlands from both codes has failed, except for relocations.
 
Chief_Chujo

Chief_Chujo

First Grade
Messages
8,131
Bukowski said:
Storm are not successful? LOL
Anyway hopefully Petes well thought out idea can find someone with $50mill.
Click to expand...

I said it's questionable. Had they not been dominant for so long I wonder where they would be. Reminder they were a money sink propped up by the game for a long time, even with their success. Swans or Lions would be massively more successful with the same period of dominance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Milhouse2020
My thoughts on an NRL expansion into WA
2 3
Replies
48
Views
4K
blue bags
blue bags
P
Perth Bears or bust?!
17 18 19
Replies
371
Views
18K
Matt_CBY
Matt_CBY

Latest posts

Top