Yes, but the topic under discussion isn't how much either player achieved during their careers, but how well they played. Saying 'Benji is 21 and has already achieved as much as Lyons, therefore he is better than Lyons', is like me saying 'Anasta has achieved as much as Lyons, and still hasn't retired, therefore he is better than Lyons', or 'any player that has been in a Premiership winning team is better than Andrew Ettinghausen or Matt Rogers, because neither of those players ever won a premiership at all.'
Your comments about the Sea Eagles of the mid 1990s, and their players' calibre, are similarly ridiculous. If the 2001 Parramatta outfit were statistically the most dominant in recent history, the Sea Eagles weren't far behind. Minor premiers three years running, including one in which they only lost four games, and 9 players chosen for the Kangaroos at one time.