What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

We can only dream...

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
A nice little look in to where the future of the game could be:

NRL could look like this if new order is not just lipstick on a pig
RICHARD HINDS
February 14, 2011


An NRL commission selected by the same vested interests it will replace inevitably invites cynicism. No matter if it were chaired by King Solomon or Ivan Milat.

But imagine, for a moment, that a game hidebound by its insular and retrograde culture and hamstrung by its commercial conflicts really has made the great leap forward. Imagine decisions are judged by their outcomes, not by who makes them and which pub he drinks in. Imagine the new commission has been in operation for six years and is being hailed a grand success. How does the game look?

The NRL prepares, for the first time, to sign a media rights deal greater than that of the AFL. Not because of the traditional carping that rugby league is grossly undervalued. Nor because the constraints and conflicts of interest caused by the old management structure have been removed. (Although that helped.)

The NRL fills its boots at the negotiating table because the league has hired the best possible executives and consultants. People who deliver what anyone signing a nine-figure cheque has the right to demand - value for money.

Benji Marshall banks $1.2 million in his first year with the Perth Prospectors. And there are no convoluted ''top-up'' deals that make him a spokesperson for a local iron ore company or compel him to attend school clinics that he - and every other player on the NRL's new average salary of $240,000 - should conduct for free.

Marshall is able to sign this guaranteed seven-figure deal because the commission has increased wages fairly, proportionately - but not in knee-jerk response to overtures by other codes. Sure, it helped the NRL salary negotiators that Karmichael Hunt and Israel Folau lasted as long in the AFL as a cold beer at a bricklayer's picnic. But the overriding motivation behind the game's sensible, graduated salary cap increase was to simultaneously ensure outstanding junior athletes would be attracted to the game while not squandering money desperately needed to nurture grass roots, ensure the survival of heartland clubs and improve infrastructure.

David Gallop is earning up to $1.5 million a year from his incentive-based contract. (Or $15 an hour shovelling fries at the Cabramatta McDonald's.)

Either way, the commission has fully empowered its most important employee and given Gallop the ability to expand his executive and drive the game. Thus the answer to an old question has been answered: is Gallop the man to grow the NRL or merely the man to supersize your McValue Meal?

Attendances have grown from an average of about 17,000 to more than 26,000 in the past five years. And that is average attendances. No dodgy aggregates like those the A-League quotes after it has added a new franchise - as the NRL has done in Perth and Brisbane.

Club membership models have finally been properly marketed. But a large proportion of the growth is due to greater attendance by women, who have been enticed by a more family-friendly environment. The NRL's new-found gender equality is emphasised at the 2018 grand final when the head of the commission steps forward to present the premiership trophy, and she is greeted with warm applause.

There is, however, a small drop in one significant league-supporting female group. No more tacky cheerleaders.

The brilliant new state-of-the-art 55,000-seat domed stadium that replaced the outdated SFS has proved a huge hit. But there are still several opportunities each year for fans to watch games at living museums such as Leichhardt, Kogarah and Brookvale. The commission not only embraces the game's heritage, it celebrates it.

A Sydney businessman visiting Melbourne turns on the television on a Friday night and watches an NRL match. Live!

Often relatively small things are symbolic of a greater malaise. One of those was that a competition presumptuously borrowing the term ''national'' had so little regard for potential converts outside its historic borders. The new commission has invested heavily to establish the team in Perth, and to ensure the future of the Melbourne Storm. But, more importantly, it is spending lavishly on promotion and development, and insisting on the support of media rights holders.

The NRL is winning ''the war in the west''. But no one on the commission ever talks about it. After all, NRL players and officials talking about the GWS Giants remains the new AFL franchise's major means of mainstream media exposure.

The civic-minded commission is considering addressing the game's dependency on poker machines, betting agencies and casino sponsorships. One of the 38 online bookies who sponsors an NRL club is taking bets on the outcome of these deliberations.

People think the game is in poor shape, the referees are idiots, players are mercenaries and NSW should bring back Gus Gould as coach. There are, after all, some things the most visionary body could not change.
 

muzby

Village Idiot
Staff member
Messages
45,959
kumbaya.gif
 

gottabegood

Juniors
Messages
571
Written by an AFL stooge, so haven't read it, but I'm sure he will mention it a few times to get his "ads" in.

Please move along.
 

Peppers

Juniors
Messages
258
Richard Hinds may be an AFL stooge but most of the time he writes fairly balanced and postive articles regarding League.
 

gottabegood

Juniors
Messages
571
Richard Hinds may be an AFL stooge but most of the time he writes fairly balanced and postive articles regarding League.


1. A leopard's spots never change.....
2. "most of the time" ..so what happens these other times....??
3. "balanced and positive articles", I remember a few people here thinking the same thing about one of his articles which I highlighted as being exactly the opposite. Thing is most people read, but few understand.
4. A leopard's spots never change.

Richard is an example of the current (and long standing) sad state of affairs were we have huge number of Non-Rugby League/AFL people employed in Sydney Media to comment on Sport and Rugby League.

I say boo to that, you should join me.
 
Last edited:

muzby

Village Idiot
Staff member
Messages
45,959
1. A leopard's spots never change.....
2. "most of the time" ..so what happens these other times....??
3. "balanced and positive articles", I remember a few people here thinking the same thing about one of his articles which I highlighted as being exactly the opposite. Thing is most people read, but they do not understand.
4. A leopard's spots never change.

Richard is an example of the current (and long standing) sad state of affairs were we have huge number of Non-Rugby League/AFL people employed in Sydney Media to comment on Sport and Rugby League.

I say boo to that, you should join me.


you should never boo a leopard, you leopardophobe..


stamp out leoparphobia!
 

Desert Qlder

First Grade
Messages
9,380
I've got time for Richard Hinds these days. Some of his articles in years gone by were questionable but it seems he's lifted his game.

No doubt that article sums up a lot of what forward thinking Rugby League supporters want to see. I'm particularly fond of his comments regarding a 'silence' in regard to Rugby League commenting on aussie rules. It should be a contractual agreement for anyone involved in the NRL (players, coaches, trainers, administrators etc.) that they are unable to talk to the media regarding aussie rules.
 

gottabegood

Juniors
Messages
571
I've got time for Richard Hinds these days. Some of his articles in years gone by were questionable but it seems he's lifted his game.

No doubt that article sums up a lot of what forward thinking Rugby League supporters want to see. I'm particularly fond of his comments regarding a 'silence' in regard to Rugby League commenting on aussie rules. It should be a contractual agreement for anyone involved in the NRL (players, coaches, trainers, administrators etc.) that they are unable to talk to the media regarding aussie rules.


My word....look at that.
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
He doesn't seem to be favouring the AFL too much:

The NRL is winning ''the war in the west''. But no one on the commission ever talks about it. After all, NRL players and officials talking about the GWS Giants remains the new AFL franchise's major means of mainstream media exposure.
 

Scarves

Juniors
Messages
612
Some people here have a bit of a negative chip on their shoulder. We shouldn't worry how our game is presented in the media. They've tried to kill Rugby League with negative crap, tried to send it to the back waters. Now we are getting 20K to trial games and membership is at record levels. I say it is time for all of us to go blind to that and just talk up our game deluxe.

Reading Hinds' articly, he sounds like he is supporting us, he can read the handwriting that's on the wall. I think many scribes, including those south of the Murray are beginning to realise how entrenched our game is. How indestructable it is. The FOX Sport top 72 program list doesn't lie. Kevin Sheedy has begrudgingly acknowledged it. And when The AFL CEO bags out the gladiator spirit of origin, you know he is concerned about the high cost our game will create for his visions. We are going famously as a code and in two Commercial TV deals time, our code will be the biggest in the land in respect of TV contracts.

All the while AFL will waste plenty of their war chest. They are like the Third Reich heading for Russia... the snow is coming. It's thick. It's cold. There is plenty of room for both games, lets not focus on AFL and their writers. That they focus so much on destroying us will cost them in the long run.
 

Latest posts

Top