ash411
Bench
- Messages
- 3,410
What's with the "L" BA? You'v got a lot to answer for mister.Ok then, its WWLWBWWBW
What's with the "L" BA? You'v got a lot to answer for mister.Ok then, its WWLWBWWBW
We might not have room to do that under the cap.
I don't think Bernie would mind but I reckon the NRL would still add it to the cap. And they'd probably use those ridiculous 'street values'.FFS surely Bernie can spare a few?
I am not sure if anything is wrong with our attack, but what is wrong with paragraphs?
In all honesty, Arthur summed it up before the game in an interview. He said we have had a lot of injuries ( believe he said our injury issues were underrated) and we may have had 6 different spine combinations. However Moses is getting better and so is the team as a whole.
Hopefully we hit our peak in the finals.
I think BA will simplify things v Broncos this Thursday attack wise
Did you read my point about what Arthur said?If you think there is nothing wrong with our attack then you're a very easy marker. Only the Tigers, Knights and Bulldogs are worse and they are all terrible teams (two of them we beat by a solitary field goal). Like I said I'm glad we're doing enough to win but we should be doing a lot better with the talent we have at our disposal. Winning is great but it doesn't change the fact that our attack is a problem.
Did you read my point about what Arthur said?
To be honest, attack never worries me when I am watching Parra.Yes I did. Are you saying the attack is as good as it could have been even if you take those circumstances into account?
To be honest, attack never worries me when I am watching Parra.
Defence is the key to winning footy so i concentrate on that. In the defence respect, we are doing fine.
Attack is all about individuals (key word) clicking and that is coming along fine as far as I am concerned.
Yeah. Well said.To be honest, attack never worries me when I am watching Parra.
Defence is the key to winning footy so i concentrate on that. In the defence respect, we are doing fine.
Attack is all about individuals (key word) clicking and that is coming along fine as far as I am concerned.
We lack punchy second rowers but we also lack nuggety second rowers.I agree that we look poor when we're right at the end. We do not threaten inside the 20m and our conclusion paragraphs are poorly structured.
I put it down to our lack of punchy second rowers. Basically, they don't score tries, so our only options are our three quarters, which makes it easier to defend.
Or are we trying to score on every tackle?We were terribly slow to get into position in the opposition's twenty. Norman in particular is not organising his outside backs effectively. We only want to score a try on the last tackle.