Who will tank it for Aus at the world cup?

[Manu Vatuvei]

Stuart Clark. People wanking on about how he should have been in the side are going to look stupid if he plays in the big games.

 

[hineyrulz]

Where's the Australian cricket selectors on that list?

 

[JJ]

Where's the Australian cricket selectors on that list?

maybe

The answer is the bowling attack - because it's sh*t... and there weren't really any better options.

 

[lockyno1]

Seriously, locky is bagging him for scoring 180 at better than run a ball :crazy:

Wrong, he did well to get 180- but he wasted over 4 OVERS of balls getting to 100. It is not hard to turn half of those into singles IMO.

 

[JJ]

Wrong, he did well to get 180- but he wasted over 4 OVERS of balls getting to 100. It is not hard to turn half of those into singles IMO.

:lol: bag someone else - he got the highest score ever by an Australian at better than a run a ball :roll:

 

[hineyrulz]

maybe

The answer is the bowling attack - because it's sh*t... and there weren't really any better options.

Beside Hilfenhaus you are probably right.

 

[lockyno1]

:lol: bag someone else - he got the highest score ever by an Australian at better than a run a ball :roll:

So what? He wasted ball;s getting to a 100. There is no reason he could not have got 100 off 110 balls. It was flat. Watson had 68 off 69 and he is a accumulator. Hayden batted way too slow mid innings.

 

[Moffo]

brad hogg is a standout. he is bollocks, we'll lose every game we play him in

we need SCG

 

[JJ]

So what? He wasted ball;s getting to a 100. There is no reason he could not have got 100 off 110 balls. It was flat. Watson had 68 off 69 and he is a accumulator. Hayden batted way too slow mid innings.

:alcho::blahb::crazy:

 

[HevyDevy]

So what? He wasted ball;s getting to a 100. There is no reason he could not have got 100 off 110 balls. It was flat. Watson had 68 off 69 and he is a accumulator. Hayden batted way too slow mid innings.

Your argument is useless Locky. The only thing Watson accumulates is failures.

 

[lockyno1]

Your argument is useless Locky. The only thing Watson accumulates is failures.

If you can't see Hayden wasted balls mid innings you are extremely stupid. Did it cost us-definately. But was he the sole reason for the loss no. That said he could have easily scored a 100 off 110 on that pitch.

 

[Macca]

You have serious issues Locky.

It doesn't matter where you are in the middle of your innings it only matters at the end of it.

In other words, it's not how you get there, it's whether you get there.

181 off 166 is phenomenal. Infact it's never been done by an Aussie before, so it was unprecedented.

Yet because he's not one of your favourites you find a way to bag him. Please try to be objective here.

Better still, just for a laugh, try taking the other side of the argument. See if you can talk some sense into yourself.

 

[Y2Eel]

HAYDEN To Top Score for us at the world cup thanks to locky!!

 

[lockyno1]

No chance, as Watto will be scoring the runs!