Lol, like when he was playing in the backline (centre i think it was)?
Rating every player every game...now there's an idea. take a lot more effort though, would require a panel for each game
No 1 deserves it more then Hayne. I cant recall many players dominating games like he has.
was he killin it at 5/8
he will never be greatest of all time cos he aint even a ball player
exactly the reason it should be points based not 3-2-1. Rate every player per game out of 10. Whoever has the highest amount of points at the end of the year wins. You could even average it out maybe with a 15 game minimum, although I think the highest amount of points would work fine. Would also give forwards a better chance at winning the award.
exactly the reason it should be points based not 3-2-1. Rate every player per game out of 10. Whoever has the highest amount of points at the end of the year wins. You could even average it out maybe with a 15 game minimum, although I think the highest amount of points would work fine. Would also give forwards a better chance at winning the award.
You wouldn't even need a 15 game minimum. Say they got 14 perfect games (140 points) and someone played the whole season averaging 6 (6 x 26 is 156) it would sort of value a full-season thing more.
That's stupid. The award should be for playing out of your skin, not playing more games. It would have to be an average.
Every player should be rated in every game. Fairest method.