Charlie124
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,509
A post in the "Josh Papalii to parra" thread (regarding Joel Edwards signing with the raiders) got me thinking about who the worst signing for 2013 might be. I'm not necessarily talking about who the "worst player" signed in the offseason is, Although I'm not excluding those opinions. I mean those signings that make no sense, like signing a particular player when you already have plenty of better players in that position. Or signing an old bloke who's going to keep a promising young prospect out of first grade. There are several other reasons a certain signing might leave you scratching your head.
So who do you think is the worst signing and why?
My vote is split between Scott Prince and SBW. Prince might be better than any of the halves the broncos have right now, but surely they would be best served blooding/grooming a long term prospect or throwing money at a younger star in the making. To me, prince is a bandaid signing made without the future in mind.
Then there's SBW, who will put bums on seats for a while provided he's not injured, but even if he gets through the season ok he's a big money signing who's more interested in his boxing "career" or whoring himself to rugby for more money than the roosters.
Thoughts?
So who do you think is the worst signing and why?
My vote is split between Scott Prince and SBW. Prince might be better than any of the halves the broncos have right now, but surely they would be best served blooding/grooming a long term prospect or throwing money at a younger star in the making. To me, prince is a bandaid signing made without the future in mind.
Then there's SBW, who will put bums on seats for a while provided he's not injured, but even if he gets through the season ok he's a big money signing who's more interested in his boxing "career" or whoring himself to rugby for more money than the roosters.
Thoughts?