What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Yahoo! That po*fter Morley gone for 4!

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,079
& that would be a total of 5 games, as he was so scared in the Sharks game he wasn't seen for the entire match. So count that as a miss too.
MIA big time when the front rowers work was needing to be done.
He was out hiding behind byrne the winger.
 
Messages
15,203
But what about Crocker?

That's two weeks in a row he's gotten off scot free after despicable incidents. It's only a matter of time until he seriously injures someone.
 

Jimbo

Immortal
Messages
40,107
Both were sickening incidents, designed purely to remove the best player on the field. They deserved at least twelve weeks each.

Disgraceful...
 

imasharkie

Coach
Messages
10,021
Surely the sharks are going to bring that Crocker incident up. Just goes to show that when you play for the goosters you are treated like angels by the disciplinery committee or is it the rorters have a friend on the board. :shock:
 

Macca

Coach
Messages
18,399
It was late and high from Crocker and I thought it was on report, how did it get past Mr Hall?
 

BeenThere

Juniors
Messages
978
Speaking of Crocker, there was another incident early in the first half where the Sharks #4 took a hit up from dummy half and was hit high -- 3 teeth loosened (visited the dentist today) and a busted nose. In hindsight should have stayed down and let the video ref deal with it.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
Blah, blah, blah...

Btw when do we play you again? Because im just wondering when our next for and against boost will be. That's five times in a row now we've put 30 on your world beaters.

I bet the boys can't wait until they play you again...oh except Gavin Lester. He'll have to watch out for those dirty eye gougers that play for your team next time. You call Morley and Crocker thugs yet your team is the dirtiest in the league, not to mention the least successful aswell. You have trippers, people who knee players in the head, eye gougers...

I can admit that Morley deserved the three weeks suspension, but to claim that Crocker's incident was bad is ridiculous. There was nothing in it. It wasnt even high and certainly not late. It sounds to me you are taking a leaf out of your coaches book and shifting the focus away from your dreadful team by focusing on someone else.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
I have an idea, why dont you forget about how bad your going this year and instead have a look at your trophy cabinet and reflect on past glories...oh, wait a second...you've never won anything have you. \\:D/
 

Nuffs

Bench
Messages
4,553
for the people who didnt see NRL scoreboard last night, Warren Smith was fuming over the Morley tackle

he showed the Nathan Cayless tackle which got him 8 weeks (?). although i didnt think it was as bad, i certainly don't think it is 8 CHARGES LESS.

for the record, Smith said that had Morley been charged with a Grade 5 Reckless, which Smith thought was appropriate, Morley would be out for at least 15 weeks

although he never said it, he pointed the finger right at the roosters club receiving preferential treatment
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
Nuffs said:
for the people who didnt see NRL scoreboard last night, Warren Smith was fuming over the Morley tackle

he showed the Nathan Cayless tackle which got him 8 weeks (?). although i didnt think it was as bad, i certainly don't think it is 8 CHARGES LESS.

for the record, Smith said that had Morley been charged with a Grade 5 Reckless, which Smith thought was appropriate, Morley would be out for at least 15 weeks

although he never said it, he pointed the finger right at the roosters club receiving preferential treatment
He didnt infer that at all. He was having a go at the current points sytem because whilst he may have thought Morley's tackle should have been graded the same as Cayless', he also said that NO WAY was the tackle worth 15 weeks.
 

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,079
No, but if there was no preferential treatment shown to Morley, he would have received 15 for his previous record for same offence loading.
whilst the tackle did not receive 15 weeks, the individual does.
He is a blind siding cat who goes missing when it matters.
 

Latest posts

Top