Your Team For The 5th Test

[Acka]

If there are any England supporters out there feel free to add what you believe the make up of the English side should be as well.

1. M.Hayden
2. J.Langer
3. R.Ponting
4. M.Hussey
5. M.Clarke
6. A.Symonds
7. A.Gilchrist
8. S.Warne
9. S.MacGill
10. S.Clark
11. G.McGrath

B.Lee 12th Man

 

[Twizzle]

need to see the pitch first

if its a real turner, then you'd be on the ball, otherwise, I cant see them making any changes

 

[willvillain]

I wouldn't change it at all.

 

[Moffo]

cowan for langer

 

[Macca]

No changes.

MacGill into the squad in case it looks really dusty.

 

[Sir Biffo]

Same team unless it's a dustbowl.

 

[madunit]

if its a spin friendly wicket like usual in tests.

1-Langer
2-Hayden
3-Ponting
4-Hussey
5-Clarke
6-Gilchrist
7-Warne
8-Lee
9-Clark
10-McGrath
11-MacGill

12th-Symonds

 

[Twizzle]

we dont need 5 bowlers to bowl the pomms out

 

[madunit]

we also don't need more than 4 batsmen to outscore them either, but we've got to have 11 players

 

[Macca]

Definately not and Symonds can bowl his offies anyway.

 

[Twizzle]

thats like saying Peitersen can wickets against the Aussies

he can hold up an end, if he gets wickets its a bonus

 

[madunit]

Definately not and Symonds can bowl his offies anyway.

symonds will be nothing more than a tail end batsmen who will bowl at 3rd change. may as well stick a specialist bowler in there.

completely annihilate the poms batting line up than previously done in this series, send them home as a completely disastorous mess

 

[Macca]

thats like saying Peitersen can wickets against the Aussies

he can hold up an end, if he gets wickets its a bonus

Symonds has taken wickets. I guess you could say they were a bonus.

Regardless, the fact is that we don't need a 5th bowler, and even if we did, we have Symonds.

 

[Smiley]

1. M.Hayden
2. J.Langer
3. R.Ponting
4. M.Hussey
5. M.Clarke
6. C.White
7. A.Gilchrist
8. S.Warne
9. B.Lee
10. S.Clark
11. G.McGrath

12. M.Johnson

 

[madunit]

Symonds has taken wickets. I guess you could say they were a bonus.

Regardless, the fact is that we don't need a 5th bowler, and even if we did, we have Symonds.

I'm sure the west indies didn't need 5 bowlers back in the 70's and 80's either to be as dominant as they were :roll:

 

[aussies1st]

Lee's had a good game so we won't be changing anything. Plus MacGill is in shocking form.

 

[hineyrulz]

yeah i think it will be an unchanged line up. Magilla has been bowling up to sh*t for the Blues.

 

[Sanchez]

same team unless its a spinning wicket
if it is macgill in for lee

 

[PARRA_FAN]

same team, you cant drop anyone. In case of injuries Johnson and MacGill into the squad.

 

[Tom Shines]

I too am of the consensus that it should be MacGill for Lee.