Zapps or Bird

[Frenzy.]

OK.

All things being equal, if we still have a team, if we have the money etc etc, who would you rather have at the club?

Bird - if he wanted to come back

Zappia - who's judgement would be clouded by his apparent dislike for Bird.

Who would we get more years out of? More value? More chance of winning a comp

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Frenzy I dont know if Zaps is the real problem.

 

[Frenzy.]

Frenzy I dont know if Zaps is the real problem.

What is? Who is?

 

[blacktip-reefy]

From what I hear it's Sticky.

 

[redback]

Neither...What about Richard Fisk replacing Zappia???

 

[redback]

From what I hear it's Sticky.

It was Kimmorleys fault Blacktip. He set them back 15 years. An ex players wifes cousins husbands butchers brothers workmate told me. You know that.

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Neither...What about Richard Fisk replacing Zappia???

Wow, under your other alias you were such a supporter of Bird too? & Latu.

 

[spider]

i dont think the problem is all zapps, and i definately dont think its sticky - but there is a problem

** starts stretching for board room bash **

sharks could not afford to pull Fisky away from the rorters

 

[Vossy]

the board, these clowns need to be held accountable, if you can vote, vote out these clowns

on this poll, cant vote for either, one is a player, one is a ceo, one saved us in games and played great but f*cked up, the other one has started to right the wrongs of previous ceo and board decisions but has made some bad calls

 

[redback]

i dont think the problem is all zapps, and i definately dont think its sticky - but there is a problem

** starts stretching for board room bash **

sharks could not afford to pull Fisky away from the rorters

Frisk and the Roosters have parted ways. He's a free agent.

 

[redback]

Wow, under your other alias you were such a supporter of Bird too? & Latu.

I don't have aliases! Good try though.

 

[spider]

i didnt know that

was it because he was feeling a little randy?

Frisk and the Roosters have parted ways. He's a free agent

 

[redback]

i didnt know that

was it because he was feeling a little randy?

I'll pay that one!

http://www.sydneyroosters.com.au/default.aspx?s=article-display&id=15675

Richard Fisk farewells the Roosters



Thursday, April 16, 2009
By mutual agreement Richard Fisk is leaving his role as General Manager, Marketing and Media effective immediately with more than 11 years service.
Richard has overseen the development of the Sydney Roosters in Marketing and Media with substantial growth and development of a very strong brand.
Sydney Roosters Chairman Nick Politis extended his thanks to Richard for his service and contribution to the Sydney Roosters and wished him the very best for the future.

 

[The Dodger]

i don't know who the problem is, and it definetely isn't the coach, but my answer would be;

GREG BIRD

 

[imasharkie]

I have man love for Birdy.

can we have both Frenz.

 

[bluey]

Why would the club even think about bird after all the crap that has went on,seriously cecil

 

[Frenzy.]

Why would the club even think about bird after all the crap that has went on,seriously cecil

Because maybe he'll be found not guilty.
Because he's coming back no matter what we hear about how much he loves France blah blah blah.
Because he's an X factor player who could help bring us the one remedy that can help save the club (a premiership).
Because the Sharks should man up and admit they were wrong to sack him if he's exonerated.

I don't even like him and have openly criticised him for his off field behaviour for years. In fact he's a fair dinkum knob and to me he has always been an accident waiting to happen

but

On the field...............he's a gun. We need to win a comp. We have a guy potentially coming back to the NRL who loves the club, loves the area, loves his team mates and loves winning. He's a big occasion player as evidenced by his MOTM awards in rep games.

If Zaps is the smart businessman so many seem to think he is it would be a smart business decision to invite Bird back.

I doubt the pride can be swallowed though

 

[redback]

Because maybe he'll be found not guilty.
Because he's coming back no matter what we hear about how much he loves France blah blah blah.
Because he's an X factor player who could help bring us the one remedy that can help save the club (a premiership).
Because the Sharks should man up and admit they were wrong to sack him if he's exonerated.

I don't even like him and have openly criticised him for his off field behaviour for years. In fact he's a fair dinkum knob and to me he has always been an accident waiting to happen

but

On the field...............he's a gun. We need to win a comp. We have a guy potentially coming back to the NRL who loves the club, loves the area, loves his team mates and loves winning. He's a big occasion player as evidenced by his MOTM awards in rep games.

If Zaps is the smart businessman so many seem to think he is it would be a smart business decision to invite Bird back.

I doubt the pride can be swallowed though

So if a player is person is charged with say murder, rape or whatever, but he is a good player then the Sharks should sign him if he's available??? Weird values you hold Frenzy.

 

[Coastal Shark]

Charged does not equate to guilt.

What if we don't sign him and he is then found not guilty. Another club signs him and gets benefits.

 

[redback]

Charged does not equate to guilt.

What if we don't sign him and he is then found not guilty. Another club signs him and gets benefits.

What if he is found guilty? The clubs image is tarnished. I think it's better to err on the side of caution CS.