I was having a few beers with a mate last night and we got onto the subject of the FFA's World Cup bid. It would have a massive impact on the NRL during the season of the cup, and I cant see any other way than holting the season for 6-9 weeks
Looking at the stadiums we currently have, we worked out that 10 of the 16 clubs would have no ground to play on. The grounds we think they will us are
Dairy Farmers (Nth Qld)
Suncorp (Bris)
Skilled Park (Gld Cst)
Energy Australia (Ncstle)
Homebush (Tigers, Dogs Souths)
SFS (Roosters, Souths)
Win Stadium (Dragons)
Melbournes new ground (storm)
That leaves just a few clubs that could even consider playing a game on thier ground.
But each of the 32 World cup Nations would need training facilities, so that rules out Penrtih, Parra, Cronulla, Canberra and Manly.
Following Ben Buckley's logic this week with the discussion for use of the MCG and its implications on the AFL, they would need the stadium for 4 weeks prior to the tournament and then for the duration. The 2010 Cup in South africa will go for a tick under 5 weeks.
Clubs are saying that lost revenue would be an obvious issue. I have heard a figure in the media this week of $100 million in compensations for NRL clubs, but surely that figure will come down to less than 1/2 that. $3 million to each club is $48 million.
Its a once in a lifetime event. Love to know what people think. Personally, I think 6-9 weeks of no competition is a great price to pay for the infrastructure that will be left behind for the NRL to use.
Looking at the stadiums we currently have, we worked out that 10 of the 16 clubs would have no ground to play on. The grounds we think they will us are
Dairy Farmers (Nth Qld)
Suncorp (Bris)
Skilled Park (Gld Cst)
Energy Australia (Ncstle)
Homebush (Tigers, Dogs Souths)
SFS (Roosters, Souths)
Win Stadium (Dragons)
Melbournes new ground (storm)
That leaves just a few clubs that could even consider playing a game on thier ground.
But each of the 32 World cup Nations would need training facilities, so that rules out Penrtih, Parra, Cronulla, Canberra and Manly.
Following Ben Buckley's logic this week with the discussion for use of the MCG and its implications on the AFL, they would need the stadium for 4 weeks prior to the tournament and then for the duration. The 2010 Cup in South africa will go for a tick under 5 weeks.
Clubs are saying that lost revenue would be an obvious issue. I have heard a figure in the media this week of $100 million in compensations for NRL clubs, but surely that figure will come down to less than 1/2 that. $3 million to each club is $48 million.
Its a once in a lifetime event. Love to know what people think. Personally, I think 6-9 weeks of no competition is a great price to pay for the infrastructure that will be left behind for the NRL to use.