Baron, I don't think you as one of the protagonists in this thread is in any position to start throwing around claims relating to a lack of eduction.
The last dickhead that claimed to be a "mathematical genius" in here couldn't answer either of the calculus questions put to him, one of which was pretty f**king simple.
Don't go down a similar path............
As for why you keep getting told off in relation to the * you so desire next to 2010, well, open up your eyes buddy.
Saints are not illegally assembled, the storm were, the storm did not even get to the grand final, they were in no way "the best" team of 2010 as much as they were the illegal team of 2010.
Everytime you suggest that they were the benchmark for 2010 it raises a few eyebrows, everytime you suggest that Saints took a premiership Parra and Manly "turned their noses up at" you contradict the statements you made congratulating Saints on their win.
Again, I will repeat, the storm were not even present on GF day 2010, they were not in the running for the trophy and had not been since April, they were also should not have been in the running for the seasons previous to this dating back to 2006.
Unless you consider cheating the cornerstone of the competition, the storm are not, and never were, the "benchmark".
Avoid sweeping statements such as "the storm would have won the GF", they probably stood a good chance, after all, they were f**kING CHEATING!
