32nd Match, Super 8's: Ireland v South Africa at Providence

[lockyno1]

lol, no. Pieterson has a much higher average in all forms of cricket.

Yes, having played a hell of a lot less games!

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

Yes, having played a hell of a lot less games!

He has played a substantial number. And he has played more tests than Collingwood. And he's just clearly a much better bat.

 

[lockyno1]

Collingwood has played twice as many games. Lets see how Pieterson is going when he has played that many games. IMO he has a great eye, but his technique is pretty ordinary.

 

[JJ]

Twizzle on Jacques Kallis

its founded on the fact that he is not a good one day batsman

:lol:

Twizzle on England

I'd say Collingwood is England's key batsmen

:lol:

God there are some strugglers on this forum.

INDEED! :Lol:

 

[Twizzle]

Your are kidding me right? A batsmen who is ranked number one in the world at averages 56 isnt the key batsmen in his country.....

he might be ranked No 1 but his world cup form is crap

Collingwood has been much better

 

[JJ]

:lol: keep it up twizzle - priceless

They've scored 2 50's each, Collingwood (201 runs) has 1 NO hence the higher average - Pieterson (169 runs) scored runs against NZ... yup, Pieterson has been crap :lol:

 

[Twizzle]

Pieterson is clearly England's best ODI bat by miles. God there are some strugglers on this forum.

not in this world cup he isn't

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

*sigh*

 

[JJ]

not in this world cup he isn't

:lol: in the only game that mattered he was - :crazy:

 

[Twizzle]

:lol: keep it up twizzle - priceless

They've scored 2 50's each, Collingwood (201 runs) has 1 NO hence the higher average - Pieterson (169 runs) scored runs against NZ... yup, Pieterson has been crap :lol:

nice attempt at spin doctoring,

so 169 is more than 201 is it JJ

sorry but not where I went to school

fact is Collingwood has outscored Pietersen, like I said

 

[Twizzle]

:lol: in the only game that mattered he was - :crazy:

so are you saying none of the other games mattered ?

you get f**king stupier every day

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

nice attempt at spin doctoring,

so 169 is more than 201 is it JJ

sorry but not where I went to school

fact is Collingwood has outscored Pietersen, like I said

You said Pietersen had been playing crap, but he has been playing well. Hence world #1.

 

[Panther_Daz]

Kallis has outscored the both of them! Oh but i forgot he is the reason behind South Africa's NRR problems.

 

[JJ]

yup - many more eh... :lol:

like I said, Pieterson scored runs in the important game, averages 56 with a SR of 90+ and is the world's #1 ODI batsman - you're pretty deluded if you think someone other than him is England's best ODI bat

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

so are you saying none of the other games mattered ?

you get f**king stupier every day

They mattered. They were also easy games against weak opposition. Hence performing well in the NZ game was clearly by far the most important.

 

[JJ]

Kallis has outscored the both of them! Oh but i forgot he is the reason behind South Africa's NRR problems.

:lol: the world according to twizzle :crazy:

 

[JJ]

so are you saying none of the other games mattered ?

you get f**king stupier every day

ok for Collingwood to score fast runs against minnows, but not Kallis???


I think if you review your posts in this thread, it'll be evident to you (well, any sane person) that you are the one getting stupider - like I said priceless :lol:

 

[Twizzle]

They mattered. They were also easy games against weak opposition. Hence performing well in the NZ game was clearly by far the most important.

of course they mattered

it wasn't me that said they didn't matter

 

[Twizzle]

ok for Collingwood to score fast runs against minnows, but not Kallis???


I think if you review your posts in this thread, it'll be evident to you (well, any sane person) that you are the one getting stupider - like I said priceless :lol:

maybe I should draw little pictures for you so you understand, and some training wheels so you can stay on track

now your saying Collingwood is scoring fast runs and Kallis hasn't been

isn't that what I've been saying........................no need to answer that, you just did

try and spin your way out of that one

 

[Manu Vatuvei]

of course they mattered

it wasn't me that said they didn't matter

Individual performances in these matches need to be taken with several grains of salt though, because the opposition were crap. Simple. Thus far Pietersen and Collingwood are both doing well in this World Cup. Pietersen is overall a much better player, and will still be so regardless of WC performances anyway.