What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Coaching on thin ice

nqboy

First Grade
Messages
8,914
http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/news/coaching-on-thin-ice/2007/04/05/1175366410230.html


The Good Friday meeting of the Roosters and Broncos at Aussie Stadium tonight is rich in symbolism, considering the rival coaches Chris Anderson and Wayne Bennett have been worshipped as saviours during their long careers but now risk what some would say is crucifixion.

Both are winless after three rounds, a gut-wrenching feeling, even for career men who have been Kangaroos coaches and won eight premierships between them. Their precarious position has much to do with "the deal which destroyed two clubs" - a secret agreement between Roosters' chairman Nick Politis and Bennett last year for Bennett to coach the Roosters this season and beyond.

The Roosters' then coach Ricky Stuart was sacked in anticipation of Bennett's arrival but the story leaked. Bennett stayed in Brisbane and, with Stuart gone, Politis hired the only experienced coach available, Anderson. It would be very bold to predict Bennett will end up at the Roosters but this is the season of miracles, isn't it?

If Bennett goes to Bondi Junction, it would only be because his position at the Broncos became untenable, meaning Anderson would be the sacrificial lamb. Should it happen, it would shroud this tortured drama in irony. On the September Monday following the revelation Bennett had entered into a clandestine contract to coach the Roosters, he met with Broncos chief executive Bruno Cullen, saying he was staying in Brisbane. The following day, he told Cullen he was going.

When Cullen asked why he would join the Roosters, evoking the long-term description of the club as "a transit lounge", Bennett said words to the effect: "I can cop being sacked by the Roosters but I can't live with being sacked by the Broncos."

Told he had a contract until the end of 2009, Bennett said that while Cullen might honour this, the board and News Ltd might still sack him if his team again bombed in the semi-finals. Cullen contacted the board, which remained solid, then called Lachlan Murdoch, News Corporation heir and a passionate supporter of the club.

Murdoch told Cullen to pass on the message: "If Wayne goes, the only loser out of this would be Wayne." Later that day, Bennett informed Cullen he would stay at the Broncos. Now, it seems, everyone at both clubs is a loser.

Being canonised one day and cannonaded the next is not new to either coach but the pressure has never been as intense as at present, more so for Bennett. Anderson, perceived as a "player's coach", was hired as an antidote to what the Roosters board maintains was an oppressive, intense regime under Stuart.


Stuart, whose club mantra seems to be the pursuit of excellence, spent part of most days in mobile phone conversation with Politis, informing him of his every decision. Anderson has been largely left on his own to jolly up the players but wins are still expected, particularly from a non-interfering board.

Tonight's game, originally scheduled to be Nine's primetime show, has been relegated to the second slot, to follow the Rabbitohs v Bulldogs. This would chagrin Politis, who has long had a rivalry with the Rabbitohs as he seeks a monopoly of the inner-Sydney market. Now, multi-millionaire Politis has two men of similar money to contend with - Academy Award winner Russell Crowe and businessman Peter Holmes a Court. They won the opening round, and both have enormous potential to be boastful.

While Anderson's close communication with his players is a cocoon from board pressures, his behaviour at last week's post-game press conference was bizarre. Anderson exploded after his team's loss to Manly, using words such as "diabolical", and making it clear he thought the the players didn't try. He also volunteered he would have a good look at himself, not a wise announcement for a man who has been away from the NRL for three seasons, coaching a club team in Wales, yet expected to lead a lost tribe. His NRL rivals say he is as outdated as the slide rule, ridiculing his resurrection of the antiquated and obsolete one-marker strategy, saying that while he was in Wales, they were finetuning their "split and attack on play two and three" ruck defence.

Bennett's behaviour following his extra-time loss to the Panthers was equally strange, even drawing comments from his players who were heard leaving Suncorp Stadium saying, "What about Benny?" He raced from the sideline, bypassing the dressing sheds, straight to the media room, seeking to technically fulfil his commitment to a "press conference", even though only three reporters had the speed to keep up with the former international fullback. After passing on most questions, he left the room after two minutes and 40 seconds and did not talk to his team.

Cullen, who has been forced to defend Bennett's non-attendance at official functions, including last month's NRL launch, was questioned about it at Wednesday's club chief executives conference. He pointed out NRL rules state a coach must face the media within 15 minutes of a game, and Bennett did this, obeying the letter of the law, if not the spirit.

But "the skinny coach", as his friends call him, attended Wednesday night's Captain's Table dinner at Telstra Stadium, an annual corporate function to raise money for breast cancer. Bennett chatted amiably with guests. The Roosters were the only club not represented, with Anderson and captain Craig Fitzgibbon sending a message to a disappointed NRL chief David Gallop of their non-attendance.

One team will win tonight's game, giving them their first points for the season. Easter analogies are bountiful - a resurrection for the winner? Easter egg on the face for the loser? If Bennett keeps losing, the last supper may not be far way.
 

McCrud

Juniors
Messages
1,131
Good read - but does anyone else get the feeling the SMH are a bit of a 'one trick pony"?

I mean, now we have the paper attempting to create a new 'scandal' involving Bennett and the Roosters at the end of this season, why go over old ground when you take the old gossip and apply it to a non-existent rumor?

The use of the term 'precarious' is a bit rich, it's only three rounds in and they are already predicting Bennett's departure (Is that a new record?) Couple this with latest Masters effort, it's clear the obsession with WB and Cullen is hitting new heights...

As a Bronco man it's great for me to read, but I don't know if I could say the same about everyone else.
 

Raider Azz

Bench
Messages
4,547
Le KooK said:
Good read - but does anyone else get the feeling the SMH are a bit of a 'one trick pony"?

I mean, now we have the paper attempting to create a new 'scandal' involving Bennett and the Roosters at the end of this season, why go over old ground when you take the old gossip and apply it to a non-existent rumor?

The use of the term 'precarious' is a bit rich, it's only three rounds in and they are already predicting Bennett's departure (Is that a new record?) Couple this with latest Masters effort, it's clear the obsession with WB and Cullen is hitting new heights...

As a Bronco man it's great for me to read, but I don't know if I could say the same about everyone else.
they need to turn their attention somewhere else after all the egg on their faces for their predictions of "doom and gloom" at the raiders.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,214
I thought this was going to be a thread about AFL after reading the title.
 

Dave Q

Coach
Messages
11,065
My view is that the Bronco's owe Bennett a lot more than he owes them.

He is by far the greatest coach in league history.



 

Stranger

Coach
Messages
18,682
:lol: Bit hard not to be eh?

I thought this article was going to be about Ben Cousins :( and west coast.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,214
Stranger said:
:lol: Bit hard not to be eh?

Hey, he's got some pretty stiff competition in Darryl Brohman and Billy Gardiner. In fact Billy coached the Broncos to their first ever premiership - reserve grade 1990. :D
 

davi

Juniors
Messages
1,933
Interesting article from Roy Masters on pressures of coaching, he has even suggested that comments on social forums like this message board puts further pressure on coaches. If that's the case some of the posters on here should do Des Hasler a favor and delete their account. :p

Seriously though Roy Masters makes an interesting point that players managers are becoming increasing more powerful. He suggests that 30 years ago these managers were not even blip on the rader. In the NBA players agent David Falk is legendary for having tough demands on teams and wielding too much power. I would hates to see the NRL going down a similar path with some of these players managers.

Masters also suggest commercial factors driven by money, pressures of winning, and players perks, are hindering coaches authority and making the job more difficult. Interesting read.


"It's been a bloody March for the NRL coaching profession, beginning with predictions the Dragons' Paul McGregor could be gone within six weeks; Broncos' Wayne Bennett has lost his aura; Jason Taylor sacked from Wests Tigers; and the Bulldogs' Des Hasler on death row until the second-last day of the turbulent month.

If club boards reacted less to the loonies on social media forums and the demands of player managers and showed more confidence in the coach, there would be more stability early in the playing season.


The Storm's Craig Bellamy is the only coach still at the same club since 2011.

Significantly, Melbourne has won more games combined in the first month of the season than any other club since 2011.

Obviously, Bellamy's preseason regime is a factor in their current success – undefeated on four wins.

Others will argue that success is guaranteed with Cameron Smith, Cooper Cronk, Billy Slater and Jesse Bromwich on their roster. However, these four internationals have missed months of preseasons with their representative commitments and consequent extended leave.


Today's NRL coach is full-time, has a plethora of helpers, is highly paid and when sacked, is almost guaranteed an assistant's job somewhere else.

Furthermore, he works within a game-wide regime of left and right attack/defence, meaning players are quickly structured.

But overall, his job is harder than the clipboard-carriers of 30 years ago for six reasons.

1. The salary cap. No NRL club can react like the Sea Eagles once did to a losing season and buy the best of Souths, then Norths, then Wests. A ceiling on total player salaries means a club can't keep a favourite son in his job by buying him three of four stars from a club who has the same legislated wages bill.

2. Player managers. They were almost non-existent in the 1980s. Today's players tend to have more fealty to their agent than their coach. Not only do they provide a sounding board for fragile egos, but they can also secure Third Party Agreements (from which the agent subtracts 20 per cent commission), and provide free suits and passes to Melbourne Cup VIP marquees, even tickets to the Super Bowl.

3. Player power. This is linked to the salary cap, in that club directors/administrators pander to players because they can't pay them more. However, coaches have contributed to the undermining of their own authority by installing leadership groups. When the leadership group fines or punishes a player for a breach, such as missing training, it absolves the coach of responsibility.

4. Social media forums. Coaches are continually under scrutiny. What was discussed by seditious barflies at the local pub is now on the internet. The vitriol on these sites is both distracting and disturbing. Players read this stuff, including the calls to mutiny against the coach. Nervous boards react to this bile.

5. Money. With big salaries to coaches comes high expectations. The Bennetts and Bellamys might enjoy comfort and financial security but they are expected to deliver results, including premierships. They do not have as much fun, nor are as willing to gamble on gimmicks as the coaches of yesteryear.

6. The Instant Gratification Society. Players and club directors have less patience and demand immediate rewards. The star schoolboy player expects to walk into a first-grade team. Players don't appear as gutted after a loss as the Tom Raudonikises and Craig Youngs. They can seek solace somewhere else after a game, rather than the company of the teammates they see all week at training anyway. Club directors, many of whom come from business backgrounds rather than the ranks of ex-players, often do not understand how success can be tantalisingly evasive. The bounce of the ball, a referee's poor call, even a tricky wind can deprive a team of a win.

Some players should start assessing the inadequacies inside their own jumpers rather than deflect blame to the coach – a point Raudonikis made at a recent Wests' Heritage night.

He began by telling the audience of a heritage match against the Dragons – before Jason Taylor coached the club – at the SCG. Tom and Team of the Century forward, Noel Kelly, spoke to the players before the game and, as they walked out, Tom said to "Ned", "We might as well have been talking to a brick wall".

Last year, Taylor invited Tom to join his team in their preparation for a game in Brisbane against the Broncos.

"I didn't have a high regard for Taylor," Tom told the Wests faithful at the function. "But I accepted the invitation, travelled on the bus with them, heard Jason talk to the players and noticed how they related to him, very positively, after their win.

"I changed my entire opinion of him."

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-more-pressure-than-ever-20170330-gvajbb.html
 

justdave

Juniors
Messages
692
Wow. 10 year old thread resurrection. Impressive. While the article was good, after reading back through thread, for whatever reason, Melbourne Storm cap cheating came to mind instantly.
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
46,134
Is Roy seriously saying it's a bad thing that club directors have business acumen and aren't former players?

Does he realise that it takes more than a chook raffle to fund an NRL team these days?
 
Top