well,, seeing you mentioned it willow,,,,,,,,
<table cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 width=145 align=right border=0> <tbody> <tr> <td>
</td></tr> <tr> <td>Stephen Fleming </td></tr></tbody></table>To put it bluntly neither captain gives a toss about the toss. Ahead of Friday's series-deciding cricket test between Australia and New Zealand, both captains were ambivalent about whether to bat or bowl. After winning the toss in both Brisbane and Hobart only to see Australia walk away with first day honours, New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming would like to have the bat or bowl dilemma fall to his opposite. "I'd like to lose it probably," Fleming said, referring to the fact the WACA wicket looks good for batting but also offers plenty for the pace bowlers. Steve Waugh said he would assess the situation on the morning of the game. "If it's really dry you have to think about batting first," Waugh said. "But if we think we can bowl them out on the first day we'll send them in." Either way, the captains agreed too much can be made of which way the coin falls. "It won't really matter what happens at the toss," Waugh said. "The toss is overstated anyway. It's quite irrelevant - the best team will always win no matter what happens at the toss." Fleming said it was more of case of making sure a team could back up whatever decision it made - something the Black Caps didn't do in Brisbane and Hobart. "The toss of the coin doesn't win a match," said Fleming, who has put Australia in twice. "At times too much is put into the toss - once you make your decision it's about backing up that decision. "Unfortunately for us in the past two tests we haven't backed it up with quality bowling."