Huh?It is not the thing that is properly done but, in terms of quantity and input, the results are generally not withstanding the procedure.
Now, given that the angular velocity of the horizontal qualifications are equivalent to that of the research provided by the organization, shouldn't we accumulate the former condensed array of incredible faults and have it approved by the staff?Huh?
Couldn't agree more?It is not the thing that is properly done but, in terms of quantity and input, the results are generally not withstanding the procedure.
Now, given that the angular velocity of the horizontal qualifications are equivalent to that of the research provided by the organization, shouldn't we accumulate the former condensed array of incredible faults and have it approved by the staff?
Loading has f**ked him up this week:
Systematically speaking from a diabolical point of view, it appears your fundamental facilities are insufficiently sophisticated to enable you to bombastinate your philosophies.Now, given that the angular velocity of the horizontal qualifications are equivalent to that of the research provided by the organization, shouldn't we accumulate the former condensed array of incredible faults and have it approved by the staff?
You can only have two fines a year. That one, and contact with the ref a couple of weeks ago. So this time it's 100 points with 100% loading for the 2 similar incidents.Josh McGuire was fined $1100 for a typical grub act stomping on an opponent's foot recently.
Given that he's got previous for this sort of shit, does anyone know if it attracts a loading as well so his next grubact costs him $2000 or so?