sportsthought for the Warriors. Bring it.
*****************************
Compensation claim
Wade McKinnons suspension for spitting got me thinking; should the NRL be compensating clubs for negligent performances of their referees?
Today I'm going to discuss whether the NRL should be compensating clubs for the negligent performances of their referees.
It goes deeper than the simple mistakes made by match officials. These mistakes always have and will happen. Sometimes they cost a team a win, sometimes they don't.
Just like players really. Sometimes they make a blunder that costs their team victory, other times they execute a move that leads to a match winning try. Such actions can result in getting dropped, sacked or even a pay rise.
Before I get too distracted lets wind the clock back to 2007, in Townsville where the Warriors are playing the Cowboys on a typically balmy Saturday night. The Warriors, on a 3 match winning streak received what I describe as the worst referring decision of 2007.
Wade McKinnon scored a brilliant individual try, but video ref Steve Nash decided that Wairangi Koopu had obstructed a defender and penalised the Warriors. It was plain to see this was not the case.
So the ref cost Wade McKinnon a try and the Warriors six points. The game was lost by six points. The math is so easy my unborn child could do it.
The next week they played in front of a paltry 10037 supporters against the Dragons at their home ground of Mt Smart Stadium.
But how many more fans would they have got if they went into the Dragons game with 4 straight wins? For arguments sake, lets say they got another 2000 punters, each paying an average of $30. That's sixty grand down the gurgler because of a dodgy call. And what can the club do about it? Nothing. This is quite a conservative estimate, considering they had a crowd of 20,000 to watch them beat the Titans the week before.
Since the start of 2004 the Warriors have not managed to put together a winning steak of 5 games or more. This is a key factor in their inability to attract large crowds on a regular basis. So, and I dont ask this lightly, should the NRL have compensated the Warriors for their error?
Lets not forget the NRL are happy to dish out $10,000 fines to clubs who criticise referees. Should the NRL as a professional organisation act in a professional manner and compensate clubs when their staff make wrong calls that impact a clubs revenues?
Significantly the Warriors received an apology from Robert Finch, the referees boss. This was a clear admission that they got it wrong. Let me say that again - the man in charge of the NRL referees apologised for the stuff up.
The game is lucky this was not a semi final, or even a grand final, where the consequences would be rather more dramatic.
Another incident from last year came in a game against the Tigers. With less than two minutes remaining Paul Simpkins sends off McKinnon for kneeing Taniela Tuiaki in the head. The decision was clearly wrong - even Tuiaki and his coach Tim Sheens felt it was unwarranted.
So, when McKinnon strode up to the judiciary a week or so ago on a spitting charge, why were these injustices not taken into account? Should he have been granted 'credits' for the poor service received from referees?
The easy answer is no, but that does not mean its the correct answer. And a yes is probably not the answer either but some sort of middle ground must be met.
Quite what that middle ground looks like is beyond me at the moment.
Its not just sour grapes from a Warriors fan either the above examples are ample evidence that he and the club have suffered. There is no point blaming the referees for making mistakes, they are as inevitable as death and taxes. Its what happens afterwards that matters.
McKinnon has had issues with referees over the last two seasons and the bloke is a hot head, no doubt about that - remember his suspension for pushing Jason Robinson last year?
But professional sporting team are not cheap and most of the clubs in the NRL sustain heavy losses. The NRL must accept the impact its referees can have on a club's revenue and as well as on a players career, and acknowledge club and player for blunders like the one the Warriors and McKinnon were a victim of.
*****************************
748 words between the starts, as per OWC.
References:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/topic/story.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10450629