I know it's a 10 month old thread (hell, it's my own thread) but I was curious. Damn, that link on top's no good anymore
I just read
this article and it confuses the hell out of me.
Storm spend $1.4m on teen
By Cameron Bell
MELBOURNE Storm are poised to outlay more than $1million for an 18-year-old from Macksville that coach Craig Bellamy has described as "a young Laurie Daley"
Greg Inglis, who has played only 13 NRL games, will this week sign one of the most lucrative contracts ever afforded a rookie in the NRL in a deal brokered by manager Allan Gainey that has the potential to earn him well over $1m by the time he is 22.
That article linked on top of the thread said we signed Inglis earlier this year for three years but before the end of the year he's signing an upgraded contract worth upwards of $300K per year?
This year we re-signed Cameron Smith until 2008 and now Inglis until 2009 when they were both already locked up until 2007 and 2008 respectively. I guess I can see the reasoning behind it and both players deserved their upgrades but it's rather redundant isn't it? It's not like they're going anywhere.
At least now we know Inglis is no longer being managed by P.O'S