I know I'm asking for grief, but here goes...
Popping up everywhere? NO!!! They are only popping up in SYDNEY! With all due respect to WI, Singapore, Greece and others, and their plans for the futures, but IMHO a nation does not exist in a international sport until the organisers of the sport in that nation are based in the nation, there is a domestic competition, and there are players living and playing in that nation are capable of representing the nation. Until then, these organisations have as much relevance as the governments and armies in exile in the UK during WWII, they look good, they add to the numbers, but in the end, they don't mean much.
The fact is that with the exception of England and NZ, given the ethnic and national diversity of Australia, you could probably field quality teams, and in many cases better sides, for all of the last RLWC nations exclusively using Aus based players who qualify based on parent and GP rules.
The time is LONG PAST for the RL establishment and supporters to support the efforts of the newer RL nations, which have a domesitic organisation and competition, like Holland, rather than inventing "national teams" for nations where RL does not exist. Frankly, I was dissapointed when the Dutch RL was criticized for not trying hard enough in this forum, while the tried and true "It's all Union's fault" excuse was cited for the recent setbacks in the Netherlands.
Lewis said:all these new countries are popping up everywhere
great to see
Popping up everywhere? NO!!! They are only popping up in SYDNEY! With all due respect to WI, Singapore, Greece and others, and their plans for the futures, but IMHO a nation does not exist in a international sport until the organisers of the sport in that nation are based in the nation, there is a domestic competition, and there are players living and playing in that nation are capable of representing the nation. Until then, these organisations have as much relevance as the governments and armies in exile in the UK during WWII, they look good, they add to the numbers, but in the end, they don't mean much.
The fact is that with the exception of England and NZ, given the ethnic and national diversity of Australia, you could probably field quality teams, and in many cases better sides, for all of the last RLWC nations exclusively using Aus based players who qualify based on parent and GP rules.
The time is LONG PAST for the RL establishment and supporters to support the efforts of the newer RL nations, which have a domesitic organisation and competition, like Holland, rather than inventing "national teams" for nations where RL does not exist. Frankly, I was dissapointed when the Dutch RL was criticized for not trying hard enough in this forum, while the tried and true "It's all Union's fault" excuse was cited for the recent setbacks in the Netherlands.