St Tangles
Bench
- Messages
- 3,116
You will wake up the imbeciles with this commentRemember Jack De Belin. Don't jump to conclusions.
You will wake up the imbeciles with this commentRemember Jack De Belin. Don't jump to conclusions.
What are we remembering? That prosecutors dropped the case after no verdict was returned a second time?
So two juries essentially were split on whether he was guilty or not. Not exactly the vindication you'd expect when saying "Don't jump to conclusions".
LiterallyAllegations do suggest he's a f#cker though.
The potential rape of a women is not something to miss 2 years of footy?Yes but wasn't found guilty
Certainly not anything to miss 2 years of footy for.
So this way is much better.
Say he is named, There will be people saying he is guilty BEFORE his day in court.
Let it play out and if it goes to court then name them
The potential rape of a women is not something to miss 2 years of footy?
The potential rape of a women is not something to miss 2 years of footy?
Just a reminder - he wasn't stood down until he was charged. Whilst he was stood down, he was continued to be paid and provided support by the club.
He wasn't named until he was charged (and thus going to court).
Innocent until proven guilty is the law still in this country?
I'm not sure the innocent player who has been stood down would agree....
But as you say, it's a small price to pay.....as long as you are not the one paying it.
De Belin didn't agree, challenged it and was told too bad by the courts.
Irrelevant to the NRL standing down a player on trial for rape
I'm not sure the innocent player who has been stood down would agree....
But as you say, it's a small price to pay.....as long as you are not the one paying it.
They are being stood down because it is a bad look for the game.
You don't think that presumes the player is guilty?
They are being stood down because it is a bad look for the game.
You don't think that presumes the player is guilty?
This merkin @Mr. ShamanUnlike De Bellend.
The NRL can do as they please.
That doesn't negate the fact that any innocent or "not guilty" player will pay a price while things play out.
Some people think it's worth it.....I'm not sure I agree with that.
They aren't a court, so it's irrelevant..
They are entitled to protect their brand. Blows my mind people still don't get this.
So why 11 years then?
Someone at my work was actually fired for doing that. Just wasn’t about the boss it was about the place in generalBecause that fits the level the NRL has decided is an unacceptable risk to it's own brand.
Are you this arced up when a bloke gets sacked for calling his employer useless and incompetent on Facebook?