Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Is it just me? Or are the playoffs teams getting away with things that the Sharks normally get pinged for again and again and again and again ad infinitum.
just you.
I saw the unbelievable tonight.
A dogs player getting sent off for 10 for a professional foul!
Could you picture that ever happening if Moore was still alive?
Nope, Blacktip. I think you're wrong again. Sure the PF rule was used correctly in that instance in that game. But otherwise: defences up too fast, incorrect play the balls, high tackles, late tackles, flop tackles, etc, etc.
just being sarcastic Popper
Ay gae involving the sharks involves a 20 penalty game.
Lets have a look at the wash up on Sunday night & we will see if there is any creedance in what you say.
Yep. Let's see what you think, Blacktip. I do believe that quite a number of things have been let go that Cronulla have been penalised for in the past. Not that I think it's wrong that they've cut out the nit-picking. I like a free flowing game. But I think the same should apply to everybody. I really think someone like Mander penalises Cronulla unmercifully for the slightest indiscretion.
And the sooner they pyss off the strip rule the better IMO.
I think that the penalties increase in line with the amount you mouth off to the Ref.
Last night the Dogs were up 4 - 0 in penalties in first half and then got penalised. They mouthed off and were marched. After that the flow of penalties went to Cowboys. By early in second half it was 5 - 5.