Tiger05
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,162
What worries me with long term deals of 3 and 4 years for non superstars is then making the decision to punt them and then winding up in the same situation we were before, and the dogs are in now....offloading players and paying a percentage (some a large one) of their contract.
I agree with the comments above that we had to make a move last year as we were at rock bottom. I just hope we don't repeat the mistakes of the past.
I've always been a fan of the somewhat mercenary NFL contract whereby it's heavily performance and results based. No other team has attempted anything like this in the NRL . I would go as far as making it strickly win vs losses. That way you avoid stats players like woods.
We may get stripped of a title for going over the cap but tell that to storm supporters who saw and felt their team win on GF night and have the DVD's to prove it.
I think long term contracts should only be offered to younger players who have proven themselves and who take a pay cut per year. So a longer term contract should be in the clubs favour because the club is the one who is taking on the risk.
I have no problems for instance with a long term contract for Twal. I'm okay with the Mbye signing as well. Maybe the other guys will be alright. I don't think they have been terrible or anything. We look better with Packer and Matulino on the field.
Reynolds is the real concern but to be fair to him he has been injured and hopefully he can get a good run of injury free footy.