Should be funny if it ends up in court. Did the nzru have a clause written into their contract with news ltd allowing them to rest players for the sole reason of putting them in cotton wool prior to the wc? If not lots of luck u gunna need it. Maybe the 'silly old sheila' can provide her usual insightful comments on the issue.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3777864a1823,00.html
Henry's ABs rest plan sparks Murdoch fury
27 August 2006
The New Zealand Rugby Union's decision to remove 22 All Blacks from the first half of next year's Super 14 has led the union towards a legal showdown with media giant News Ltd.
A spokesman for Rupert Murdoch's company said the NZRU would be in breach of the broadcasting contract with News Ltd if those 22 players didn't take the field.
The NZRU agreed to rest the players as part of Graham Henry's master plan to win the Rugby World Cup next year.
Murdoch's all-powerful organisation was critical of the plan earlier this week but the relationship appears to have deteriorated badly since then, with News Ltd corporate affairs director Greg Baxter slamming the NZRU.
"It's pretty black and white. It's a breach of the contract," he said.
"We were not even consulted and we are not happy about it."
News Ltd paid the southern hemisphere partnership of New Zealand, Australia and South Africa (Sanzar) $664m to broadcast the tournament from 2006 to 2010 - money that keeps New Zealand rugby afloat.
A legal stoush could be disastrous for rugby. News Ltd pays the NZRU on a quarterly basis and, if it believed there was a breach of contract, it could withhold payment. That would force the NZRU to wrestle with Murdoch's legal team to prove the legality of its plan.
When NZRU chief executive Chris Moller formally announced the decision, he said all relevant stake holders had been consulted. It's now obvious Moller didn't call the most important player, News Ltd.
Moller, speaking from Pretoria last night, said: "We've taken legal advice to make sure our situation is the correct one.
"The obligation is to make sure the pre-eminent players are available. Through the (All Blacks) rotation policy we have been playing other players and we didn't go to News in respect to that. We take a view it's not a dissimilar exercise."
News clearly disagrees. "I don't think (Moller's) logic stacks up at all," Baxter said.