yobbo84
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,896
Why is it...
1. That a video referee can not rule on forward passes due to misleading camera angles, but they can use those same camera angles to determine if a player is offside or not?!
2. That referees in the last 5mins of a game will stop the clock when the ball has been dead for only about 10 seconds? They would not do this in the other 75mins. They're only meant to stop the clock for time-wasting, not to give the other side a chance.
3. That teams don't place a greater emphasis on distance when kicking for touch?! I hate it how my team only ever seems to make 10-15m from kicks when other teams make 30m.
4. Further to the above, why is it that kicks for touch always seem to miraculously cross the sideline right over a 10m line? Helping the referees mark an easy 10?
5. That if a player is infront of a kicker, not involved in the play, but inside the 10m when a teammate scores, it is no try and a penalty? But if the kick was a shocker and the ball hit the offside player, it'd be accidental offside and a scrum.
6. That referees have to wait for the OK from Nine/Foxsports before blowing time on for a match? The camera crew have been there for 4 hours and yet somehow they're never ready.
7. That when players want to stop a clock they can get the winger to pack a scrum at prop, a centre at hooker, and the fullback at lock, only to get back into normal position once the clock is stopped? The idea was that if one team is ready for the scrum, the referee stops the clock so as to not waste time. IMO whoever has packed the scrum when the clock is stopped must be forced to stay in that position when the actual scrum is packed. That'd teach players.
???
1. That a video referee can not rule on forward passes due to misleading camera angles, but they can use those same camera angles to determine if a player is offside or not?!
2. That referees in the last 5mins of a game will stop the clock when the ball has been dead for only about 10 seconds? They would not do this in the other 75mins. They're only meant to stop the clock for time-wasting, not to give the other side a chance.
3. That teams don't place a greater emphasis on distance when kicking for touch?! I hate it how my team only ever seems to make 10-15m from kicks when other teams make 30m.
4. Further to the above, why is it that kicks for touch always seem to miraculously cross the sideline right over a 10m line? Helping the referees mark an easy 10?
5. That if a player is infront of a kicker, not involved in the play, but inside the 10m when a teammate scores, it is no try and a penalty? But if the kick was a shocker and the ball hit the offside player, it'd be accidental offside and a scrum.
6. That referees have to wait for the OK from Nine/Foxsports before blowing time on for a match? The camera crew have been there for 4 hours and yet somehow they're never ready.
7. That when players want to stop a clock they can get the winger to pack a scrum at prop, a centre at hooker, and the fullback at lock, only to get back into normal position once the clock is stopped? The idea was that if one team is ready for the scrum, the referee stops the clock so as to not waste time. IMO whoever has packed the scrum when the clock is stopped must be forced to stay in that position when the actual scrum is packed. That'd teach players.
???