people are like sheep , they will always follow whats most popular.
see afl in the southern states.
I'm guessing RL still has at least some profile in Melbourne despite it not being the main sport there? That's not the case in the UK, the sport receives virtually no media coverage at all, certainly not in mainstream national media and so there's just no penetration into the public conscience. This isn't just a problem in London, I live in a town about 25 minutes outside of the sport's heartlands in the north of England and I'd say about 95% of the people here have probably heard of RL but either don't know what it is and would be unable to differentiate from RU or it just doesn't register with them at all. I'd say less than 5% are likely to have ever seen a match even on TV, that's being generous. And this isn't rare, there are places that are RL mad and then you can drive 5-10 minutes to the next town and nobody knows about the sport. Even in the heartlands where the sport is most popular it can still be a bit of an underground thing and you'd probably struggle to see it if you didn't know it was there. So imagine what it's like in a massive, apathetic city with no penetration at all.
It's not a case of Londoners not liking the sport, it's a case of them not really knowing it exists. I think Londoners probably do like the sport and it could be relatively popular there if things were done the right way.
I understand where you're coming from, but to be honest if you went to Melbourne before the Storm were established I don't think you'd find too many people who knew that there were two types of Rugby... in fact I went to Adelaide recently and that still seems to be true down there.
What's happened in Melbourne is that the Storm have put the game in the papers by being successful (winning in their first year helped), and that in turn has enabled the game to get a foothold. It's obviously hard in the UK, but this stuff can be done.
when i was in melbourne for the world cup back in 2008,the morning of the game i was sat in a cafe having breakfast,reading the melbourne age,a big arsed broadsheet back then,the sports section consisted of 4-5 pages of AFL,4-5 pages of horse racing and the write up about the england v australia page was probably a 3rd of a page,hidden away...
i would'nt no whats its like week to week covering the storm? but id imagine its abit more,not a lot, but a bit more than what london got/gets in the london evening standard
Yes soccer is the main problem. But, ya cud write a book on this. A lot of it is also to do with the history of England and its culture.
They had a phone in on BBC Radio 5 Live last year on rugby league v rugby union, and in that hour a lot would be explained to you. One southerner said that, "Rugby League is the beta-max of sport", he's totally wrong of course, but again it's to do with history, perception and culture; even Wales has 7 distinct cultures and accents, England, well I'd guess they have 25 plus.
Would they have done better staying in Fulham?
Perhaps what I mean is what would be the sweet spot location for a London RL club?