What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2016 R24 - Rabbitohs 12-6 Sharks @ ANZ Stadium

Round 24: Rabbitohs v Sharks

  • Draw after Golden Point

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
  • Poll closed .

hunters

Juniors
Messages
1,813

ZEROMISSTACKLES

First Grade
Messages
8,700
Mate those stats don't even include tackle busts?? But if you are quoting this as the true source of stats, follow the link to the fantasy points that confirm the 7 tackle breaks. Perhaps you weren't watching???
Mate your too late lol. You gotta be in early son.

All of us here that watched the game and posted anything spectacular in that game, including an Inglis break. There was none. Thats why none of us posted him making a break. He played just his role.

The "fantasy" link lol. Fantastical link is it?..lol post up the link like Ive done but theyve made a mistake obviously, it happens.

The link Ive provided is an accurate reflection of the game. Ill post a video to show there was no 7 line breaks. SEVEN and no mention from all the posters here or even in the video highlights.

Start from the 2nd page of this thread and see if you can find a post about ONE of Inglis apparent line breaks. We all watched it from the start and saw none.
 
Last edited:

hunters

Juniors
Messages
1,813
Mate your too late lol. You gotta be in early son.

All of us here that watched the game and posted anything spectacular in that game, including an Inglis break. There was none. Thats why none of us posted him making a break. He played just his role.

The "fantasy" link lol. Fantastical link is it?..lol post up the link like Ive done but theyve made a mistake obviously, it happens.

The link Ive provided is an accurate reflection of the game. Ill post a video to show there was no 7 line breaks. SEVEN and no mention from all the posters here or even in the video highlights.

Start from the 2nd page of this thread and see if you can find a post about ONE of Inglis apparent line breaks. We all watched it from the start and saw none.
You do know there is a difference between tackle busts and line breaks right?
 

ZEROMISSTACKLES

First Grade
Messages
8,700
Thanks for the link. I checked it and under TB the second column from the right it says 60+ and obviously that's been for the season with Souths. There's not even a number 7 on the stats you provided. The only sense I can make of it is that you knew his TB count for last week and this week there's been 7 added to that count.

Anyway, I was talking about line breaks. Not worried about little tackle busts, that's easily forgotten or not even MENTIONED by us here who watched that game and posted about it. Its line breaks that maketh the Greg Inglis. Lets face it, its something that he's not doing as often as he use to. I'm a big fan of Inglis but the reason for that is his ability to break the line. I watch Souths for Inglis and Burgess only.

http://m.nrl.com/telstrapremiership...ubid/11/playerid/160/seasonid/44/default.aspx

Stats above show no line breaks, no breaking the line, no highlight, no big play. He didnt play poorly either, he just did his job and boosted the team just by being on the field. Thats about it!
 
Last edited:

Rabbits20

Immortal
Messages
42,509
Thanks for the link. I checked it and under TB the second column from the right it says 60+ and obviously that's been for the season with Souths. There's not even a number 7 on the stats you provided. The only sense I can make of it is that you knew his TB count for last week and this week there's been 7 added to that count.

Anyway, I was talking about line breaks. Not worried about little tackle busts, that's easily forgotten or not even MENTIONED by us here who watched that game and posted about it. Its line breaks that maketh the Greg Inglis. Lets face it, its something that he's not doing as often as he use to. I'm a big fan of Inglis but the reason for that is his ability to break the line. I watch Souths for Inglis and Burgess only.

http://m.nrl.com/telstrapremiership...ubid/11/playerid/160/seasonid/44/default.aspx

Stats above show no line breaks, no breaking the line, no highlight, no big play. He didnt play poorly either, he just did his job and boosted the team just by being on the field. Thats about it!
I checked Hunters is right.

You are wrong again.

Nice troll attempt though.
 

hunters

Juniors
Messages
1,813
Not worried about little tackle busts, that's easily forgotten or not even MENTIONED by us here who watched that game and posted about it.

http://m.nrl.com/matchcentre/tabid/11376/matchId/5034/default.aspx

You clearly didnt watch Inglis game. Check the stats and FACTS up above. Like I said, he BEAT NO ONE. 7 tackle breaks HAHA. Stop lying boy.

Not even mentioned huh? lol

Thanks for the link. I checked it and under TB the second column from the right it says 60+ and obviously that's been for the season with Souths. There's not even a number 7 on the stats you provided. The only sense I can make of it is that you knew his TB count for last week and this week there's been 7 added to that count.

Mate there is a pretty obvious filter on that page for you to read round 24 stats. I guess I was expecting too much for you to work the simple things but then this is the whole point of our little discussion!

All this aside, you've obviously simply misread Rabbits20 post where he quoted tackle busts and you've misinterpreted it as line breaks but just can't bring yourself to admit it! Happy to sign out of this as I don't imagine you'll concede any time soon!

Peace.
 

Latest posts

Top